"Assault Weapons" PsyOp
By Servando Gonzalez
Men fight with their minds. The tools they
use are irrelevant.
— Jeff Cooper.
Guns they’ll never find
cuz’ my lethal weapon is my mind.
— Ice T.
Something that is never missing in the arguments
of gun grabbers is the term “assault weapons.” According
to them, assault weapons are one of the main causes of gun violence
in the United States.
In the web site of Senator Diane Feinstein, a corrupt California
politician and Council on Foreign Relations member in the vanguard
of the anti-gun movement, we find out the following:
Stopping the Spread of Deadly Assault
On January 24, Senator Feinstein introduced the Assault Weapons
Ban of 2013, a bill to stop the sale, transfer, importation
and manufacturing of military-style assault weapons and high-capacity
ammunition feeding devices.
Nowhere in her site, however, can we find a definition
of what she thinks are “assault weapons.” In the same
fashion, in none of the anti “assault weapons” arguments
can we find a definition of what the authors consider “assault
weapons.” The very few times they have tried to define the
term, what they have produced is nothing more than unintelligible,
For example, according to our enlightened politicians, as expressed
in the Title XI – Firearms, Subtitle A – Assault Weapons
in the Control and Prevent Crime Act of 1994 (H.R. 3355), (AKA
Federal Assault Weapons Ban (AWB), or Public Safety and Recreational
Firearms Use Protection Act.), ‘‘(v)(1) It shall be
unlawful for a person to manufacture, transfer, or possess a semiautomatic
According to Federal Assault Weapons Ban, and assault weapon is:
(A) A semiautomatic rifle
that has an ability to accept a detachable magazine and has
at lease two of the following:
(i) A folding or telescoping stock;
(ii) A pistol grip that protrudes conspicuously beneath the
action of the weapon;
(iii) A bayonet mount;
(iv) A flash suppressor or threaded barrel designed to accommodate
a flash suppressor; and
(v) A grenade launcher; or
(B) A semiautomatic pistol that has an ability
to accept a detachable magazine and has at least two of the
(i) An ammunition magazine that attaches to the pistol outside
of the pistol grip;
(ii) A threaded barrel capable of accepting a barrel extender,
flash suppressor, forward handgrip or silencer;
(iii) A shroud that is attached to, or partially or completely
encircles, the barrel and that permits the shooter to hold the
firearm with the non-trigger hand without being burned;
(iv) A manufactured weight of fifty ounces or more when the
pistol is unloaded; and
(v) A semiautomatic version of an automatic firearm; or
(C) A semiautomatic shotgun that has at least
two of the following:
(i) A folding or telescoping stock;
(ii) A pistol grip that protrudes conspicuously beneath the
action of the weapon;
(iii) A fixed magazine capacity in excess of five rounds; and
(iv) An ability to accept a detachable magazine;
It is evident that the gun grabbers cannot produce
a coherent definition of the term “assault weapon.”
So, the question remains: What is an “assault weapon”?
According to some, “assault weapon” is a pejorative
term invented by an urban elite of idiots that wouldn’t
know an AR-15 from an AK-47. But I don’t agree. Like “global
warming,” “second hand smoke,” “CO2 emissions,”
“homophobia,” “peak oil,” “Cold
War,” “national security,” “missile gap,”
“gun lobby,” “hate speech,” “gun
crime,” “fiscal cliff,” “sequestration,”
and many other widely used psychologically-charged terms, the
term “assault weapon” is not a creation of ignorant
idiots, but most likely was created by very clever people at the
Tavistock Institute, the Stanford Research Institute, or any other
of the globalist conspirators’ psychological warfare think
tanks. All of them are irrational, contradictory concepts designed
to be repeated over and over ad nauseam in order to brainwash
the people’s minds and condition them into accepting even
more limitations of their personal freedoms in the way to implement
the communo-fascist totalitarian nightmare the CFR conspirators
call the “New World Order.”
The fact that the scary term “assault weapon” was
conceived by a psychological warfare think tank to blur in the
minds of the public the distinction between a semi-automatic and
a fully automatic rifle is not a figment of my imagination. As
early as 1988, Josh Sugarmann, Executive Director of the Violence
Policy Center, an anti-gun lobby with ties to the globalist conspirators,
let the cat out of the bag, when in a primer for gun-control activists,
admitted that the
“… issue of handgun restriction
remains a non-issue with the vast majority of legislators, the
press, and public. … Assault weapons … are a new
topic. The weapons’ menacing looks, coupled with the public
confusion over fully automatic machine guns versus semi-automatic
assault weapons — anything that looks like a machine gun
is assumed to be a machine gun — can only increase the
chance of public support for restrictions of these weapons.”
After they created the term, the anti-gun conspirators,
with full support of the CFR-controlled media, began a frantic
campaign to ban the so-called “assault weapons.” The
fact that the term was an artificial creation for brainwashing
purposes was confirmed by researchers Bruce H. Kobayashi and Joseph
E. Olson. Writing in the Stanford Law and Policy Review,
they found that “Prior to 1989, the term ‘assault
weapon’ did not exist in the lexicon of firearms. It is
a political term developed by anti-gun publicists to expand the
category of assault rifles.”
The bottom line is that there is no such thing as an assault weapon
because assaulting is a military tactic not related to any particular
type of weapon. Ultimately, an assault weapon is anything you
can use as a weapon to assault. During WWI the assault weapon
of choice was the bayonet. During the war against Spain in 1868-1878,
the assault weapon of choice of the Cuban patriots was the machete.
Of course, the CFR conspirators and their minions know perfectly
well that there are no such things as “assault weapons.”
They use the term as a way to convince gullible Americans to peacefully
surrender their guns. Why? Because History has shown over and
over that it is much easier to enslave an unarmed population than
an armed one.
The Founding Fathers were aware of the fact that only an armed
populace can deter tyranny. Writing in The Federalist
No. 46, James Madison stated it clearly:
[The Constitution preserves] the advantage
of being armed which Americans possess over the people of almost
every other nation… [where] the governments are afraid
to trust the people with arms.
And have no doubts about it. Taking the arms
from the people is exactly what the CFR conspirators have in mind.
Speaking to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in 1950, CFR
agent James P. Warburg put it bluntly when he threatened our spineless
politicians: “We shall have a world government, whether
or not we like it. The question is only whether world government
will be achieved by consent or by conquest.”
But Americans created a peculiar type of country: a republic,
not to be controlled by an oligarchy or by a democratic mob. To
avoid a faction getting full control of the government, they also
created the separation of the three powers, with an independent
press acting as a sort of fourth power.
Traditionally, there were two ways to illegally grab control of
a country: by force through a mass revolt, the communist way,
or through a coup d’état, the fascist way. But the
CFR conspirators have used a not-well-known third way: by infiltration.
That’s the Fabian way. No wonder the symbol of the Fabian
Society is the wolf under a sheep’s skin.
And we have to admit that the Fabian system worked. The first
step the CFR conspirators took on their way to implement totalitarianism
in America was to infiltrate and take control of the mainstream
press. In 1917, Congressman Oscar Callaway explained to his colleagues
“On March, 1915, the J.P. Morgan interests,
the steel, shipbuilding, and powder interests, and their subsidiary
organizations, got together 12 men high up in the newspaper
world and employed them to select the most influential newspapers
in the United States and sufficient number of them to control
generally the policy of the daily press of the United States.
They found it was only necessary to purchase the control of
25 of the greatest newspapers. The 25 papers were agreed upon;
emissaries were sent to purchase the policy, national and international,
of these papers; an agreement was reached; the policy of the
papers was bought, to be paid for by the month; an editor was
furnished for each paper to properly supervise and edit information
regarding the questions of preparedness, militarism, financial
policies, and other things of national and international nature
considered vital to the interest of the purchasers. This policy
also included the suppression of everything in opposition to
the wishes of the interests served.”
The second step was to infiltrate, first, the
Republican Party and, second, the Democratic Party. Once they
got control of the two parties, they were ready for the next step.
Following the same approach, in the 1930s the CFR conspirators
took a third step when they infiltrated and took control of the
State Department. In order to accomplish this, the conspirators
offered their “help” by suggesting the creation of
a group of “experts” in foreign policy to advise State
Department officials. This was the true origin of the War and
Peace Studies project, a clever scheme written by University of
Chicago professor and CFR asset Jacob Vinter. The project was
financed with funds provided by the Rockefeller Foundation.
In 1948, they took an important fourth step when created the National
Security Council and the nefarious Central Intelligence Agency.
The true purpose of the NSC was to set a ring of disinformation
around American presidents they didn’t fully control, turning
them into virtual puppets. Less than a year after its creation,
they turned the CIA into a tool for carrying out illegal covert
operations — the true and only purpose for which they had
created the Agency.
Finally, they concentrated most of their abilities on infiltrating
the U.S. military. To that end, in 1962 they started an operation
innocuously called the Military Fellows Program. The program recruited
military officers as interns who spend one year at the Harold
Pratt House. The patriotically and ethically challenged interns
who demonstrated their willingness to advance their careers by
betraying their Oath of Office and become CFR agents, were recruited
and their careers rapidly advanced.
The CFR’s Military Fellows Program has been a sure way to
indoctrinate potential agents that already have been discovered
by CFR talent spotters. Once their qualities for the treasonous
job have been firmly established, the candidates are recruited
as CFR secret agents —the best agent is the one who doesn’t
know, or doesn’t want to know, that he has been recruited—
and put to work on behalf of the CFR’s secret goals. As
part of the plan, they are pushed up above the ranks until they
reach key positions in the U.S. military apparatus. Currently,
most of these secret CFR agents infiltrated into the military
are occupying positions of power in the U.S. armed forces.
The process is not new, and the conspirators have been using it
successfully for many decades. Dwight Eisenhower, George Marshall
and Matthew Ridgway were the product of these pushed promotions.
More recent examples are Colin Powell, Alexander Haig, and James
Petraeus. The results of this CFR effort of systematic infiltration
of the U.S. military has brought results far beyond their expectations:
as of 2006, there were 124 senior officers of the three branches
of the U.S. armed forces with confirmed membership in the CFR.
Today, most likely the number is higher.
Nevertheless, despite all their advances into forcing Americans
into totalitarianism, the CFR conspirators have found several
major obstacles they have not been able to bypass. In the first
place, Americans believe that freedom and liberty are their birthrights.
Secondly, and even more important, they are fully convinced that
the only thing that ultimately guarantees such natural rights
is the possession of firearms. It seems, therefore, that it will
not be easy for the conspirators to enslave the American people
by consent, so they are planning to do it by force.
Contrary to what Obama and other CFR minions believe, the Second
Amendment to the Constitution does not give Americans the right
to own firearms, it only recognizes it as a birthright. Therefore,
even if the CFR conspirators pass laws eliminating the Second
Amendment, or all of the Bill of Rights, or even the Constitution,
Americans still have the natural right to own firearms to protect
themselves from a tyrannical government.
To make things worse for the conspirators, the Internet explosion,
which broke their total control of the news and leveled the informational
field, added another stumbling block in their way to implement
totalitarianism in America. The examples of China, North Korea,
and Cuba show that totalitarianism and free access to the Internet
For more than a century, the globalist conspirators have orchestrated
false flag operations to convince the American people that the
course they have secretly traced is the right one. Beginning with
the blowing up of the USS Maine battleship in the Havana
Bay in 1898, which they used as a pretext to initiate their imperialist
expansionism, to the 9/11 events, which they used as a pretext
to justify their current imperialist push, this technique has
proved to be a great success. But the existence of the Internet
has allowed the people to know of divergent interpretations. It
took more than half a century for the people to discover that
the Pearl Harbor attack had been orchestrated by the conspirators
to justify pushing the country into an unwanted war. It took less
that six months for many people to realize that the purpose of
the 9/11 events was to push Americans into a new unwanted, unwinnable
In an effort to convince the American people of the dangers of
guns, the CFR conspirators created Fast and Furious, a false flag
operation whose objective was for the government to surreptitiously
sell weapons to Mexican drug gangs and later blame gun shows for
the killings committed with these weapons. During a visit to Mexico,
Obama proclaimed: “This war is being waged with guns purchased
not here but in the United States. More than ninety percent of
the guns recovered in Mexico come from the United States…”
But Fast and Furious failed miserably, so they conceived other
Strong evidence has surfaced pointing to the fact that the story
advanced by the government about the shootings in a cinema in
Aurora, Colorado, and in a school in Newtown, Connecticut, differ
from the facts. But in the case of the Newtown shooting, which
the conspirators believed was going to be a catalyzing event to
convince the American people about the need for gun registration
and confiscation, the false flag operation failed, and the failure
was even more catastrophic than Fast and Furious.
Instead of running to police stations to surrender their firearms,
the very day after the Newtown shooting, thousands of Americans
of all political persuasions voted with their feet by rushing
to gun stores and virtually depleting them of firearms and ammo.
Actually, this was a vote of no confidence in their government.
Evidently, despite all of their think tanks and experts, the conspirators
miscalculated the reaction of the American people. And what a
strong reaction it has been. Far from convincing Americans of
surrendering their firearms, they have convinced them not to do
According to an anti-gun guru, the long lines of people trying
to buy guns were due to fear that someone is going to come take
them. And then he reasons, “If you fear your guns will be
taken, why buy more? Won’t they be taken too?” Apparently
it never crossed his narrow mind that people are buying guns because
finally have realized that they may have to use them to protect
their guns, their property, their families and themselves from
the far reaching, sticky hands of the government.
The bottom line is that despite all their control over the American
government, the military, the press and the most important institutions,
the CFR conspirators cannot impose their communo-fascist New World
Order upon the American people without having depriving them of
the internet and their firearms first.
In the case of the Internet, it would be relatively easy for them
to create a false flag operation in the form of a cyber attack
that would cost the lives of several thousand American children
and their pets. This would be used as a pretext to cancel the
current Internet and create a new “secure,” limited
access one. In the case of gun confiscation it would be a little
more difficult. After passing laws fully illegalizing the possession
of firearms, the next step would be going house by house searching
for guns to confiscate. But some sheriffs already have declared
they would not comply with such a law, and many members of the
military would not be willing to do so.
In Aesop’s fable “The Mice and the Cat,” the
assembly of mice approved the idea of hanging a bell on the cat.
All we need to do, they concluded, is to hang a bell around the
cat’s neck. Wherever he goes, the bell will ring, so we
can hear when the cat is coming before it is even close! All the
mice jumped and clapped at the idea. Suddenly, a wise old mouse
said, “That’s a very brilliant idea. Now, who will
hang the bell around the cat’s neck?”
Moral: It is one thing to say that something should be done, but
quite another to do it.
 If one is to believe the anti-gun lobby, the “gun lobby,”
composed of gun manufacturers and dealers, whose only purpose
is to make money, keeps the nation “hoodwinked.” Curiously,
however, most “gun lobby” members never mention the
existence of the big pharmacy, agribusiness, big oil and other
 For a study of how the CFR conspirators have used language
as a brainwashing tool, see my book Psychological Warfare
and the New World Order: The Secret War Against the American People.
 See, http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/funderprofile.asp?fndid=5310&category=79.
Sugarmann is the author of two books, National Rifle Association:
Money, Firepower & Fear and Every Handgun is Aimed
at You: The Case for Banning Handguns.
 Josh Sugarmann, “Assault Weapons and Accessories in
America,” The Educational Fund to End Handgun Violence
and the New Right Watch, September 1988.
 Congressional Record, vol. 54, February 9, 1917,
 See, Robert Farley, Obama Claims 90 Percent of Guns Recovered
in Mexico Come From U.S.,” Politifact.com, April
16, 2009. On the other hand, it is difficult to believe that drug
lords send their minions to a gun show in the U.S. to pay $700.00
for a semi-auto AK-47, when they can get from Castro or Chavez
a full auto AK for less than fifty bucks.
 Servando Gonzalez, “Kiss Your Internet Goodbye,”
NewsWithViews.com, April 6, 2003, www.newswithviews.com/public_comm/public_commentary7.htm.
Servando Gonzalez, a Cuban-born American writer, semiologist and
intelligence analyst, was an officer in the Cuban army during
the missile crisis. He has written books, essays and articles
on Latin American history, intelligence, espionage, and semiotics.
Servando is the author of Historia herética de la revolución
fidelista, The Secret Fidel Castro, The Nuclear Deception: Nikita
Khrushchev and the Cuban Missile Crisis and La madre
de todas las conspiraciones, all available at Amazon.com.
He also hosted the documentaries Treason in America: The Council
on Foreign Relations and Partners in Treason: The CFR-CIA-Castro
Connection, produced by Xzault Media Group of San Leandro,
California, both available at the author's site at http://www.servandogonzalez.org.
His book, Psychological Warfare and the New World Order: The
Secret War Against the American People appeared in late 2010
and is available at Amazon.com.
Or download a
.pdf copy of the book you can read on your computer or i-Pad.
His book, OBAMANIA: The New Puppet and His Masters,
is available at Amazon.com.
Servando's new book (in Spanish) La CIA,
Fidel Castro, el Bogotazo y el Nuevo Orden Mundial, just
appeared, and is available at Amazon.com
and other bookstores online. He is already working on his next
book, The Council on Foreign Relations and the Betrayal of
the American People: A Chronology of Treason, which he plans
to have ready by this summer.