Back to Articles Index



How Warmongering Republicans and Neocons Learned to Stop Worrying
and Love Obama

By Servando Gonzalez

Copyright © 2011. All rights reserved.

The 2008 election brought to the White House another CFR-controlled puppet. A few days after he moved into the White House, it became evident that, contrary to the promised change, Obama’s policies would seamlessly continue Bush’s policies. In short, Obama is actually Bushama.

Proof of it is that one of the harshest indictments against Obama was made by Naomi Wolf in her book The End of America: Letter of Warning to a Young Patriot.[1] Curiously, the subject of her book, published in 2007, was not Obama, but George W. Bush.

Just a few days after the election, some observers of the political scene noticed that many of Bush’s neocons were delighted with the new tenant in the White House. An article published in the English-language edition of the Swiss newspaper Zeit-Fragen, reported that David Brooks, Richard Perle, Max Boot, Mona Charen and other leading members of the neocon/neonazi cabal, were ecstatic over Bushama’s appointments — most of them CFR members.

Joining the neocon dissonant chorus, pseudo-conservative professional disinformer Rush Limbaugh highly praised the appointment of Hillary Clinton as secretary of state, and qualified Obama’s decision as “brilliant.” As a way of payment, Obama publicly criticized Limbaugh, in a subtle effort to strengthen his damaged bona fides vis-à-vis a growing number of his disenchanted listeners who have growing suspicions that the radio host is not what he claims to be.

Another voice of the pro-Obama chorus, faux-conservative David Horowitz, scolded concerned conservative activists filing lawsuits regarding Obama’s citizenship status. Apparently, not because he did not believe the claims about Obama’s illegitimacy, but rather because the new CFR puppet had already shown his true hawkish nature — a fact he believed conservatives should appreciate.[2 ]
Obama’s authorization to increase military operations in Afghanistan, the illegal bombing of Libya, and other paramiliary operations, has sounded like celestial music to the Pentagon, the armaments industry, and the warmongers of the right and the left. It is not surprising to discover, however, that not many of the hyperpatriotic warmongers have allowed their sons and daughters to enlist in the U.S. armed forces.

The last step in this amazing transformation took place in early May 2011. After Bushama told gullible Americans his version of Osama bin-Laden’s death, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Mark Levin, and even Glenn Beck,[3] congratulated him for his leadership and mucho machismo in ordering the assassination. In addition, Dick Cheney, Rudy Giuliani, Karl Rove and other former members of the Bush administration, joined the dissonant chorus singing their praise for Obama.[4] Giving further proof of the truth in Samuel Johnson’s dictum that patriotism is the last refuge of the scoundrel, both branches of the Repucratic party in Congress joined forces in praising Bushama.

Adding weight to the argument that Obama is actually Bushama, is the fact that, every passing day, the alleged assassination of bin-Laden more and more resembles the 9/11 false flag operation. As in the case of the 9/11 events, the cover-up has been more revealing than the operation itself.

For example, just a few hours after Bush offered his version of the 9/11 events, conflicting versions began appearing. Moreover, a few days later it was known that government officials and other mysterious personnel had devoted an inordinate amount of time destroying the evidence. Just a few minutes after something crashed against the Pentagon, photos showed a line of Pentagon employees, picking up the pieces of the alleged plane in an effort to hide the evidence.

In the same fashion, just a few hours after Bushama informed the American people about the bin-Laden operation, conflicting versions kept flowing, forcing Bushama’s mouthpieces to modify version after version. According to the first version, bin-Laden opposed armed resistance to the assassination team and one of his wives had been killed when bin-Laden used her as a human shield. Later, however, it was reported that he was unarmed, he didn’t resist the Navy Seals, and none of his wives had been killed.[5] In addition, no pictures of bin-Laden’s body have been shown to the public, and, in an obvious attempt to destroy the evidence, his cadaver allegedly was buried at sea. No photos of the burial have been provided.

On the other hand, there is growing evidence pointing to the fact that Osama bin-Laden has been dead for many years, and that the recent mise en scène is nothing but the continuation of a disinformation exercise conceived in the times of George W. Bush.[6] According to some reliable sources, bin-Laden died in late 2001 or early 2002, and his cadaver was put on ice, waiting for the right moment to use it as a political tool.[7]

Finally, probably one of the most reprehensible things brought by George W. Bush’s “War on Terror” was his acceptance of torture, particularly water boarding — conveniently disguised under the euphemism “enhanced interrogation technique” —, as an alleged mean to extract information from war prisoners. Surprisingly, most of his followers of the Republican religious right, who call themselves Christians, accepted, approved and apparently enjoyed the abomination.

But now, one of the by-products of the bin-Laden operation is the notion that the information to locate his hideout was obtained through the application of water boarding and similar interrogation techniques to prisoners. Surprisingly, most of Obama’s supporters of the Democratic religious left, who call themselves progressives, have accepted, approved and apparently enjoyed the abomination.

So much for the “change” brought on by the Bushama regime. As the French say, “The more things change, the more they stay the same.”



1. Naomi Wolf, The End of America: Letter of Warning to a Young Patriot (White River Junction, Vermont: Chelsea Green, 2007.
2. See, David Horowitz, “Obama Deranged Syndrome,” National Review Online, See also, David Horowitz, “How Conservatives Should Celebrate the Inauguration,” Front Page Magazine, January 20, 2009,
3. Philip Caulfield, “Limbaugh, Beck shower praise on Obama,” Daily News, May 2, 2011,
4. Jef Zeleny and Jim Rutenberg, "Gearing Up for Obama in 12, Republicans Pause to Praise," The New York Times, May 3, 2011, pp. A1, F5.
5. Josh Gerstein and Matt Negrin, “White House Changes Osama bin Laden Account.”, May 2, 2011, Also, Garance Franke-Ruta, “The Slippery Story of the bin Laden Kill,” The Atlantic, May 3, 2011,
6. See, Paul Joseph Watson, “Top Government Insider: Bin Laden Died In 2001, 9/11 A False Flag,”, May 4, 2011,
7. Kurt Nimmo and Alex Jones, “Red Alert: Government Had Osama bin Laden Frozen for Years,”, May 1, 2011,


Servando Gonzalez is a Cuban-born American writer, semiologist and intelligence analyst. He has written books, essays and articles on Latin American history, intelligence, espionage, and semiotics.
Servando is the author of Historia herética de la revolución fidelista, The Secret Fidel Castro, The Nuclear Deception and La madre de todas las conspiraciones, all available at

He also hosted the documentaries Treason in America: The Council on Foreign Relations and Partners in Treason: The CFR-CIA-Castro Connection, produced by Xzault Media Group of San Leandro, California.

His latest book, Psychological Warfare and the New World Order: The Secret War Against the American People just appeared and is available at Or download a .pdf copy of the book you can read on your computer or i-Pad.

Servando's new book, OBAMANIA: The New Puppet and His Masters, will appear next June.




 ----------------- ----------------------------------