Back to Articles Index

Rush Limbaugh: A Roosevelist in the Closet? - Part I


By Servando Gonzalez
(01/01/2014)

 

A few days ago disinformer extraordinaire Rush Limbaugh began a propaganda campaign to prove that Pope Francis is a Marxist. Limbaugh bases his attacks on the fact that the Pope has expressed his displeasure for the so-called “free” trade capitalism in his Apostolic Exhortation of November 24, 2013. “This is just pure Marxism coming out of the mouth of the pope,” said Limbaugh.[1]

It is important to keep in mind that Limbaugh caters to a generation of listeners who were brainwashed in the existence of a Cold War between evil Communism and good Capitalism. To these people, “Marxism” is a synonym of Communism.

But, contrary to comon belief, Communism is not the creation of Karl Marx. Actually, Moses Mordecai Marx Levy, a.k.a. Karl Marx, published his Communist Manifesto in 1848. But the Manifesto borrowed so heavily from Clinton Roosevelt's book The Science of Government Founded on Natural Law, published in 1841, which Marx found at the Reading Room of the British Museum, that it was close to a plagiarism. Dr. Emanuel M. Josephson, one of the few authors who has studied the subject in detail, titled his book on Clinton Roosevelt Roosevelt’s Communist Manifesto.

Josephson was absolutely right. Both Roosevelt’s Science and Marx’s Manifesto agree on the prerequisites for the implementation of the new communist society:

1. Abolition of private property
2. Heavy progressive income tax
3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance
4. Confiscation of property of all emigrants and rebels
5. Creation of a Central Bank
6. Government control of Communications & Transportation
7. Government ownership of factories and agriculture
8. Government control of labor
9. Corporate farms, regional planning
10. Government control of education
11. Abolition of religion
12. Abolition of the family as basic social unit

It was not by chance, however, that Marx found Roosevelt's book. In 1849, both Clinton Roosevelt and Horace Greeley, owner of the New York Tribune, the country’s first national newspaper, provided funds for the Communist League in London to pay for the publication of Marx’s Communist Manifesto. Moreover, Greeley put Marx on his newspapers’ payroll.[2]

So, in honor to truth, we should stop calling Communists “Marxists.” The true synomym for Communists should be “Roosevelists.” Give to Caesar what belongs to Caesar. On the other hand, just a perfunctory reading of the planks needed for the implementation of Communism shows that currently the U.S. is well advanced on its way of becoming a Communist country.

But wait!. It seems, that not only Communism, but also Fascism is an American invention.[3]

In 1912, way before Mussolini rose to power in Italy and Hitler in Germany, Edward Mandell House, a secret agent for some Wall Street bankers and oil magnates, wrote his novel Philip Dru: Administrator. The book, actually a political manifesto thinly disguised as a novel, is a blueprint for a fascist takeover of the U.S. government through a coup d’état
.
The fact that both Communism and Fascism are the creation of international bankers explains why the Rockefellers have always been in love with Castro and every other communist and fascist dictator in the world. It may also explain why puppet Obama is pushing America in the way of communo-fascism with the full support of Wall Street bankers.
But only brainwashed Americans who still see the present situation as a political battle between conservative Republicans and liberal Democrats have a reason to be surprised, because there is nothing to be surprised about Obama.

Barry Soetoro is just the logical conclusion of a process that began a long time ago, in the early 1900s. Its secret goal was turning the American Republic, and eventually the world, into a communo-fascist totalitarian dictatorship under the control of a few international bankers and oil magnates. This would be a totalitarian dictatorship very similar to the one Fidel Castro has successfully tested in Cuba for over half a century on behalf of his Wall Street masters (more on this in a coming article). This new global totalitarian dictatorship is what the conspirators call the New World Order.


Is Pope Francis a Commie?


It is interesting to see that initially the Left accused Pope Francis of being a Fascist linked to the military in Argentina, and now the Right is accusing him of being a Communist. Well, if both the Fascist Left and the Communist Right have a grudge against Pope Francis, to me that is a sure sign that he is doing something right.

Rush Limbaugh wants make us believe that he is a true defender of capitalism. But, what type of capitalism does he defend? Mon and Pop capitalism? No. He is a defender of monopoly capitalism. To Rush Limbaugh, corporations, particularly transnational corporations, are the true models of capitalism.

But Limbaugh cannot be more wrong.

Probably the best feature of capitalism is competition. Competition is the force that makes businesses lower their prices and offer better products or services. But the ultimate goal of monopoly capitalism, the type of capitalism favored by big corporations, is to destroy their competitors. John D. Rockefeller, the inventor of the trust — a precursor of the corporation — expressed it very clearly when he affirmed, “Competition is a sin.”
Actually monopoly capitalism is not capitalism at all, but socialism, either in its Fascist or Communist varieties. Ultimately, Fascism is the state controlled by the corporations — Benito Mussolini called Fascism “lo stato corporativo” (the corporate state), while Communism is the state controlling the corporations.

But we are currently experiencing the birth of the communo-fascist New World Order, a socio-political aberration in which the state controls some corporations while some mega-corporations and international bankers control the state. The NWO comprises the worst characteristics of both Communism and Fascism.

Why is Rush Limbaugh so intent on defaming Pope Francis? The reason is simple: the new Pope has refused to be a tool of the New World Order, and Limbaugh is the NWO’s obedient disinformation tool.Limbaugh the Disinformer
Probably the most influential among the professional disinformers whose main job is to confuse the American people and keep them unable to focus on the real enemy is talk radio host Rush Limbaugh. I am using Limbaugh as an example, not nly because he is a faux conservative, but because he is the most important agent in the two-party PsyOp — a psychological warfare operation whose goal is to make the American people believe the two main political parties have diferent agendas.

Rush Limbaugh has always despised the “black helicopter crowd,” implying that only those afflicted by a peculiar mental disease could believe or contemplate such claims. He openly mocked these beliefs in his so-called “Kook Test”:

 

“Do you believe that David Rockefeller, Henry Kissinger and other famous members of the New World Order provide daily instructions to agents of the FBI, CIA, BATF, and National Organization of Women? Do you believe that the feminist movement was the brainchild of David Rockefeller for the purpose of having men and women at war with each other on a daily basis so as to distract them from the real conspiracy of the CFR? If you have answered even one of these questions “yes,” then you are a kook and have passed the test.”

He has been very careful, however, in hiding from his listeners the fact that in his Memoirs David Rockefeller himself confirmed that the Rockefeller family is “part of a secret cabal working against the best interest of the United States.” He also wrote that he and his family are internationalists “conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure —one world, if you will.” Moreover, he added: “If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”[4]

In the same fashion, on February 8, 2009, speaking at the at 45th Munich Conference on Security Policy at the Hotel Bayerischer Hof, National Security Advisor Major General James Jones, told those in attendance:

 

“As the most recent National Security Advisor of the United States, I take my daily orders from Dr. Kissinger, filtered down through General Brent Scowcroft and Sandy Berger, who is also here. We have a chain of command in the National Security Council that exists today.”

Moreover, Limbaugh has never mentioned that in July, 2009, in a speech at the opening of the new CFR headquarters in Washington D.C., just across the street from the State Department, Hillary acknowledged the fact hat she is a CFR puppet when she admitted that from then on, “I won’t need that far to go to be told how we should be doing and what we should think about the future.”

So, David Rockefeller himself has confessed that he is conspirirng with other around the world to radically change it, and two senior government officials have admitted that they get their orders from the Council on Foreign relations. So much for Limbaugh’s “Kook Test.”

But talk radio is a relatively new phenomenon. Actually, the talk radio’s brainwashing job is a complement to the excellent brainwashing job that has been carried out for many long years by the American mainstream media. However, if one is to believe Rush Limbaugh, the mainstream media in under the control of the Left. He fails to mention, though, that the U.S. mainstream media is owned by the Right, which means that if they allow their leftist employees to control the information it is only because it benefits the owners’ secret agenda.
Limbaugh the Brainwasher

I always refer to Rush Limbaugh as “disinformer extraordinaire,” because he is by far one of the best. How can we positively identify a professional disinformer? It is relatively easy. Look for these two signs: constant repetition and inconsistency.

One of the favored brainwashing techniques used by professional disinformers —which also allow us to identify them— is constant repetition. They repeat a few key concepts over and over until they are embedded in the target’s unconscious mind. Once it is done, the target will think that the ideas are his, without realizing that they have been implanted in his mind.

This technique was successfully used by Hitler through radio and by Castro through television. And constant repetition is one of the main characteristics of Limbaugh’s radio show. Just listening to him for half an hour you will hear the words “conservatives,” “Republicans,” “liberals,” and “Democrats,” repeated over and over dozens of times. Another words repeated over and over are “administration,” as in “the Obama administration” or “the Bush administration,” “bipartisan,” and “both sides of the aisle.” To professional brainwasher Limbaugh everything is just a matter of partisan politics, and the only parties he mentions in his program are the two factions of the Repucratic Party. He sometimes mentions the Tea Party, but the Tea Party is just a faction of the Republican Party.

Another clear sign that we are facing a professional disinformer is inconsistency. Disagreement is part of the democratic, civilized way of living. The expression of contradictory points of view by different individuals is strong evidence of freedom and a very healthy feature of a democratic republic. Also, we need to acknowledge the fact that sometimes people change their points of view with the passage of time.

What is not acceptable, however, are contradictory points of view expressed by the same individual at the same time. It is precisely because of their inconsistency why most people don’t like politicians. Inconsistency is the mark of the opportunist and the liar. It is also the mark of the professional disinformer.

It seems that the worldview of Limbaugh and the rest of the disinformers like him is reduced to the narrow field of partisan politics (bipartisan politics actually means Council of Foreign Relations-controlled politics). Anything else that cannot be explained by partisan politics apparently is irrelevant to Rush. He never tries even to explain is why, despite of all the partisan rhetoric, when it gets in power the new “administration” never even tries to undo the bad things made by the previous “administration.” On the contrary, what we see is a seamless continuation of the same disastrous anti-American policies.

Also, you never hear in any of Limbaugh programs the words “New World Order,” “North American Union,” or “Council on Foreign Relations.” And when a caller begins questioning the government’s actions during 9/11, he is cut short and called a leftist loony.

It is interesting to notice that, though Limbaugh and other disinformers of the Right call themselves conservatives, they evidence the belief in one of the most obnoxious characteristics of the liberal’s ideology: situational ethics, which is just a fancy name for moral relativism.

True conservatives are not supposed to believe in moral relativism. To them, some actions are right or wrong disregarding the political affiliation of the perpetrator. To faux conservatives like Limbaugh and most of his listeners, however, an action is right or wrong depending of the political affiliation of the person who carries it out.

Limbaugh practically ignored the existence of Ron Paul during his presidential campaign, and only mentioned Dr. Paul to criticize him. Also, Constitution Party candidate Chuck Baldwin was nonexistent to Limbaugh. On the other hand, he gave lots of coverage to John McCain, who played the same treasonous role Gore and Kerry played in previous presidential campaigns. By the way, it is not a coincidence that the three of them, Gore, Kerry, and McCain, are proud members of the treasonous Council on Foreign relations.

When George W. Bush’s treasonous activities against this country became so blatantly obvious that it was becoming impossible to ignore them —his attitude towards illegal immigration was probably the most notorious—, even some of the minor brainwashers like Sean Hannity began criticizing him a little bit. But not Rush Limbaugh. He was adamant. Everything that meant even the slightest criticism of George W. Bush was and still is anathema for him.


Notes:


1. See, Elias Isquith, “Rush Limbaugh: The Pope Sounds Like a Marxist,” Salon.com, November 29, 2013, http://www.salon.com/2013/11/27/rush_limbaugh_the_pope_sounds_like_a_marxist/
2. Some people believe that both Clinton Roosevelt’s Science and Karl Marx’s Manifesto were plagiarized from yet an earlier eighteenth century collection of writings by Adam Weishaupt, and that Roosevelt simply picked up the torch and passed it on to Marx, but that’s another story.]
3. Look for the first issue of my political satire comic OBSERVANDO, titled “American Inventors,” to appear in January, 2014. There will be a version for the Apple iPad and a .pdf version to read on all tablets and ßcomputers.
4. David Rockefeller, Memoirs (New York: Random House, 2002), p. 405.


Rush Limbaugh: A Roosevelist in the Closet? - Part II

By Servando Gonzalez
(01/01/2014)

A Department of Homeland Security Report dated April 7 2009, titled “Right-wing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment,”[1] warned members of the DHS about the possibility of violence by “right-wing extremists,” who are identified as people concerned about illegal immigration, abortion rights, increasing federal power, restrictions on firearms, abortion and the loss of U.S. sovereignty. These are considered extremists capable of carrying out violent attacks.

The Homeland Security Report was actually a sort of follow up on a previous Report by the Missouri Information Analysis Center. It linked conservative groups, like followers of presidential candidates Ron Paul, Chuck Baldwin, Bob Barr, the so-called patriot movement, and people who oppose the North American Union and the New World Order, to domestic terrorism.[2] It is not a coincidence that the Missouri IAC Report was compiled with the assistance of the Department of Homeland Security.

The Dog That Didn’t Bark

The most important thing about the Report, however, is not the people it mentions, but the ones it doesn’t. Like in Sherlock Holmes’ famous novel, the dog that didn’t bark is an important clue to decipher the mystery. In this case, it is also a useful tool to identify some prominent traitors.
For example, it is an important clue that Rush Limbaugh is not mentioned in these reports. Allegedly Limbaugh is a right wing conservative, and apparently he had turned into the Obama Administration’s Public Enemy Number One, to the point that Obama himself openly criticized him several times.

Limbaugh even reached the cover of Newsweek magazine, who depicted him as a right-wing extremist. But, despite all of this, he is not mentioned in the DHS Report. Nor is mentioned Limbaugh’s alter ego, Sean Hannity, also the target of Obama’s criticisms. Why this important omission?
Very simple: because, despite their claims to the contrary, Limbaugh does not represent a real threat to the globalist conspirators’ plans. The conspirators only fear true American patriots like Ron Paul, Chuck Baldwin, Bob Barr and returning military veterans —the ones who some day may decide to tip over the rotten apple cart in this country
.
Actually Rush Limbaugh on the “conservative” side of the Repucratic coin, as well as Amy Goodman on the “liberal,” Democratic one, play an important role in this ongoing psychological warfare operation currently being waged by the globalist conspirators against the American people.

The Two-Party PsyOp


A measure of the importance of the role these professional disinformers play in this ongoing two-party PSYOP was unintentionally revealed some years ago, when Obama himself had to come to the rescue of none other than his archenemy Rush Limbaugh.

Rush Limbaugh highly praised the appointment of Hillary Clinton as secretary of state, and qualified Obama’s decision as “brilliant.” As a way of payment, Obama publicly criticized Limbaugh, in a subtle effort to strengthen his damaged bona fides vis-à-vis a growing number of his disenchanted listeners, who have growing suspicions that the radio host is not what he claims to be.

As the saying goes, you can only fool some of the people some of the time, and some of Limbaugh’s listeners apparently smelled a rat. Finally they had realized that both Bush and the Republican Party had betrayed them and were defecting in drones to join the tea parties and other non-controlled political groups.

Most of Limbaugh listeners apparently have lost their capacity for thinking by themselves —no wonder they proudly call themselves “ditto-heads.” Nevertheless, during the final months of Bush’s ignominious regime, more and more well-informed true conservative listeners were giving Limbaugh a hard time. They were expressing their concern for unchecked federal spending policies and even questioning Bush’s treasonous behavior on immigration, only to be summarily cut out of the air by Limbaugh.

The fact that many of his listeners were defecting may have shown on Limbaugh’s diminishing ratings, something that must have worried the CFR disinformers. So, the conspirators sent their puppet Obama to rescue their puppet Limbaugh by openly criticizing him and elevating Limbaugh to leader of the opposition.[3]

Immediately, perhaps based on the belief that the enemy of my enemy by force has to be my friend, the anti-Obama listeners came back to the Limbaugh’s program to get their daily doses of disinformation. Most likely they ignored the fact that the pseudo-enemy of my enemy is not necessarily my friend. Nevertheless, the conspirators’ strategy worked to perfection: after Obama criticized him, Limbaugh’s ratings surged. Rush himself recognized the fact when he admitted that recent efforts by the Obama administration to demonize him actually helped his show by raising his audience 32 percent.[4]

I have brought up the case or Rush Limbaugh not because I have any special grudge against him. On the contrary, radio being my first profession and one I still love, I admire him professionally. Rush Limbaugh was the man who created conservative talk radio from scratch.

Living in California, I mostly used to listen to Public Radio (which in my mind I had dubbed “Radio Moscow”) until one day I discovered Rush on a local AM station (which some years later I dubbed “Radio Berlin”) and I became one of his listeners. But these were the times when Bill Clinton was in the White House, and Rush was very convincing. As soon as W. Bush became president, however, Rush lost most of his edge.

Initially Rush Limbaugh was a true watchdog, playing the critical role the mainstream media had deserted. But at some time in his successful career, Rush became part of the mainstream media —when you can claim to have more than ten million listeners, you are mainstream media, like it or not— and the CFR conspirators don’t like having loose cannons in the mainstream media.

I am not going to speculate why Limbaugh and many others like him betrayed the American people by choosing to work as brainwashers for the CFR conspirators instead of serving their country. I remember, however, that a few years ago Rush had a problem related to overuse of prescription drugs,[5] and also that some time later he signed an eight-year contract for 200 million dollars.[6] As the saying goes in Latin America: “A los periodistas se les pega o se les paga” —“Journalists: you either hit them or buy them”—, and, contrary to what most Americans may think, here in the U.S. things are not too different.

Is Pope Francis a Commie as Rush Limbaugh Claims?


Pope Francis has denied that he is a Marxist.[7] Moreover, the fact that he is a critic of globalization and the “new tyranny” practiced by transnational corporations[8] does not make him one. Neither he is a critic of capitalism.[8]

His Apostolic Exhortation Evangeli Gaudium,[9] with his call to global leaders to act on global poverty and growing inequality has nothing to do with the promotion of Communism. On the contrary, a close reading of Pope Francis Exhortation shows that it is actually anti-communo-fascist — a sort of anti-New World Order Manifesto. This explains why the globalist conspirators have mobilized their disinformers on the Left and the Right against the Pope.

Not even Pope Francis’ declaration that he knows a lot of “good” Marxists can prove that he is a Marxist. I know some good Republicans, Democrats and even Tea Partiers, and it does not mean that I am one of them or that I approve their political ideas, but only that I think they are not bad people, just ideologically confused. And most Republicans and Tea Partiers are ideologically confused, mostly thanks to the brainwashing job of professional disinformers such as Rush Limbaugh.

Do you think that all Republicans know the secret goals of the Republican Party? Do you think that all Democrats are aware of the secret goals of the Democratic Party? Do you think that most Occupy Wall Street activists knew that CFR agent George Soros was bankrolling their movement? I don’t think so. In the same fashion, many members of the American Communist Party would be shocked if they discovered that Communism is not only a creation of some the most reactionary international bankers, but also that these same bankers have been the ones secretly bankrolling the Communists.

Actually, Many American patriots have suspected the existence of a communist conspiracy at the higher levels of the U.S. government. But, eventually, some of them discovered the true source of treason. At least a senior member of the John Birch Society, who for many years had been blaming the Communists for many acts of treason against the American people, reached the conclusion that Communism was just a smokescreen to hide the CFR conspirators’ treasonous activities. This was the case of William J. Jasper, a Senior Editor of The New American, the John Birch Society’s organ.

In an introductory article to an issue of the magazine fully devoted “to present the truth about the Conspiracy and the Conspirators, and their goals, strategy and tactics …”, Jasper mentions the case of Bella Dodd, a member of the National Committee of the Communist Party U.S.A. who left the party and became an ardent anti-Communist, as saying, “I think that the Communist conspiracy is merely a branch of the much bigger conspiracy.”[10] Jasper also mentions that in his essay The Truth in Our Time, Robert Welch, founder of the JBS, stated, “the Communist movement is only a tool of the total conspiracy.”[11]

It seems that to Rush Limbaugh any mention of the growing gap between the mega rich and the hyper poor,[12] the loss of individual freedom, the invasion of privacy and the growing police state is nothing but a leftist myth. Unfortunately, it is not. Actually, it is tragic reality. A reality as the result of the implementation of the New World Order, a sort of neo-feudalism with just two social classes, the masters and the serfs — a real-life “Hunger Games” that world bankers and transnational corporations are pushing down our throats — with help of both the Left and the Right.

Transnational corporations have no ideology, principles, virtues, scruples, ethics or morals. Their only purpose is to maximize the profits of their shareholders — by any means, even if it requires outsourcing jobs, using child labor in Third World countries’ sweatshops, destroying small farmers with their use of genetically modified seeds, killing people with their prescription drugs, or hiding from the people true sources of cheap power. All of these actions go against the Catholic Church’s doctrines — at least in theory. No wonder Pope Francis is against them.

The bottom line is that currently there is not enough evidence to prove that Pope Francis is a Communist — which does not mean that tomorrow the evidence can’t appear. Anyway, if the evidence surfaces, I would be the first to be surprised, because the Catholic Church has always been more akin to fascism than to communism [13] — which explains the Vatican’s unashamed love not only for Hitler, Mussolini and Franco, but also for the fascist tyrant in Cuba. On the other hand, there are no doubts whatsoever that Rush Limbaugh and his fellow disinformers are nothing but communo-fascist mouthpieces serving the anti-American interest of the New World Order globalist conspirators.

Notes:


1. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Office of Intelligence and Analysis, Assessment, “Right-wing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment,” April 7, 2009.
2. See, Kurt Nimmo, “Secret State Police Report: Ron Paul, Bob Barr, Chuck Baldwin, Libertarians are Terrorists,” Infowars.com. March 11, 2009, http://www.infowars.com/secret-state-police-report-ron-paul-bob-barr-chuck-baldwin-libertarians-are-terrorists/.
3. See, Tim Shipman, “Barack Obama picks a fight with Rush Limbaugh as bipartisan spirit crumbles,” Telegraph.co.uk, January 24, 2009, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/barackobama/4331839/Barack-Obama-picks-a-fight-with-Rush-Limbaugh-as-bipartisan-spirit-crumbles.html.
4. See, Joe Kovacs, “The Right Stuff,” WorldNetDaily, March 11, 2009, http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=91390.
5. See, Damian Sofsian, Conservative Radio Host's Prescription Drug Addiction Story, EzineArticles.com, http://ezinearticles.com/?Conservative-Radio-Hosts-Prescription-Drug-Addiction-Story&id=74378.
6. See, “Right Wing Radio Host Rush Limbaugh Signs 200 Million Dollar deal,” M&G News, July 2, 2008, http://www.monstersandcritics.com/news/usa/news/article_1414676.php/Right_wing_radio_host_Rush_Limbaugh_signs_400_million_dollar_deal.
7. See, “Pope Francis says he is no Marxist, AFP, December 15, 2013, http://news.yahoo.com/pope-francis-says-no-marxist-094958904.html.
8. See, Katie McDonough, “Pope Francis: Capitalism ‘a new tyranny,’” Salon.com, November 26, 2013, http://www.salon.com/2013/11/26/pope_francis_capitalism_is_a_new_tyranny/. Contrary the misleading title of this article, the word “capitalism” does not appear in the Pope Francis “Apostolic Exhortation.”
9. See, http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/francesco/apost_exhortations/documents/papa-francesco_esortazione-ap_20131124_evangelii-gaudium_en.html#SOME_CHALLENGES_OF_TODAY%E2%80%99S_WORLD.
10. William F. Jasper, “Conspiracy: Where’s the Proof?,” The New American, Vol. 12, No. 19 (September 16, 1996), pp. 5-10.
11. Ibid.
12. According to recent statistics, 74 percent of all the wealth in the United States is owned by the wealthiest 10 percent of all Americans. See, Michael Snyder, “83 Numbers From 2013 That Are Almost Too Crazy To Believe,” Infowars. Com, December 17, 2013, http://www.infowars.com/83-numbers-from-2013-that-are-almost-too-crazy-to-believe/
13. Actually, Liberation Theology is not Marxism, but Jesuit fascism in disguise. See, Malachi Martin, The Jesuits: The Society of Jesus and the Betrayal of the Catholic Church ( New York: Simon & Schuster, 19870).


------------------

Servando Gonzalez, is a Cuban-born American writer, historian, semiologist and intelligence analyst. He has written books, essays and articles on Latin American history, intelligence, espionage, and semiotics. Servando is the author of Historia herética de la revolución fidelista, Observando, The Secret Fidel Castro: Deconstructing the Symbol, The Nuclear Deception: Nikita Khrushchev and the Cuban Missile Crisis and La madre de todas las conspiraciones: Una novela de ideas subversivas, all available at Amazon.com.

He also hosted the documentaries Treason in America: The Council on Foreign Relations and Partners in Treason: The CFR-CIA-Castro Connection, produced by Xzault Media Group of San Leandro, California, both available at the author's site at http://www.servandogonzalez.org.

His book, Psychological Warfare and the New World Order: The Secret War Against the American People is available at Amazon.com. Or download a .pdf copy of the book you can read on your computer, iPad, Nook, Kindle or any other tablet. His book, OBAMANIA: The New Puppet and His Masters, is available at Amazon.com. Servando's book (in Spanish) La CIA, Fidel Castro, el Bogotazo y el Nuevo Orden Mundial, appeared last year, and is available at Amazon.com and other bookstores online.

His most recent book, I Dare Call It treason: The Council on Foreign Relations and the Betrayal of the America, juste appeared and is available at Amazon.com and other bookstores online.

Servando's two most recent books in digital versions only are The Swastika and the Nazis: A Study of the Misuse of the Swastika by the Nazis and the first issue of the political satire series OBSERVANDO: American Inventors.

t

 

 

 

 
 ----------------- ----------------------------------