Limbaugh: A Roosevelist in the Closet? - Part I
By Servando Gonzalez
A few days ago disinformer extraordinaire Rush
Limbaugh began a propaganda campaign to prove that Pope Francis
is a Marxist. Limbaugh bases his attacks on the fact that the
Pope has expressed his displeasure for the so-called “free”
trade capitalism in his Apostolic Exhortation of November 24,
2013. “This is just pure Marxism coming out of the mouth
of the pope,” said Limbaugh.
It is important to keep in mind that Limbaugh caters to a generation
of listeners who were brainwashed in the existence of a Cold War
between evil Communism and good Capitalism. To these people, “Marxism”
is a synonym of Communism.
But, contrary to comon belief, Communism is not the creation of
Karl Marx. Actually, Moses Mordecai Marx Levy, a.k.a. Karl Marx,
published his Communist Manifesto in 1848. But the Manifesto
borrowed so heavily from Clinton Roosevelt's book The Science
of Government Founded on Natural Law, published in 1841,
which Marx found at the Reading Room of the British Museum, that
it was close to a plagiarism. Dr. Emanuel M. Josephson, one of
the few authors who has studied the subject in detail, titled
his book on Clinton Roosevelt Roosevelt’s Communist
Josephson was absolutely right. Both Roosevelt’s Science
and Marx’s Manifesto agree on the prerequisites
for the implementation of the new communist society:
1. Abolition of private property
2. Heavy progressive income tax
3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance
4. Confiscation of property of all emigrants and rebels
5. Creation of a Central Bank
6. Government control of Communications & Transportation
7. Government ownership of factories and agriculture
8. Government control of labor
9. Corporate farms, regional planning
10. Government control of education
11. Abolition of religion
12. Abolition of the family as basic social unit
It was not by chance, however, that Marx found
Roosevelt's book. In 1849, both Clinton Roosevelt and Horace Greeley,
owner of the New York Tribune, the country’s first national
newspaper, provided funds for the Communist League in London to
pay for the publication of Marx’s Communist Manifesto. Moreover,
Greeley put Marx on his newspapers’ payroll.
So, in honor to truth, we should stop calling Communists “Marxists.”
The true synomym for Communists should be “Roosevelists.”
Give to Caesar what belongs to Caesar. On the other hand, just
a perfunctory reading of the planks needed for the implementation
of Communism shows that currently the U.S. is well advanced on
its way of becoming a Communist country.
But wait!. It seems, that not only Communism, but also Fascism
is an American invention.
In 1912, way before Mussolini rose to power in Italy and Hitler
in Germany, Edward Mandell House, a secret agent for some Wall
Street bankers and oil magnates, wrote his novel Philip Dru:
Administrator. The book, actually a political manifesto thinly
disguised as a novel, is a blueprint for a fascist takeover of
the U.S. government through a coup d’état
The fact that both Communism and Fascism are the creation of international
bankers explains why the Rockefellers have always been in love
with Castro and every other communist and fascist dictator in
the world. It may also explain why puppet Obama is pushing America
in the way of communo-fascism with the full support of Wall Street
But only brainwashed Americans who still see the present situation
as a political battle between conservative Republicans and liberal
Democrats have a reason to be surprised, because there is nothing
to be surprised about Obama.
Barry Soetoro is just the logical conclusion of a process that
began a long time ago, in the early 1900s. Its secret goal was
turning the American Republic, and eventually the world, into
a communo-fascist totalitarian dictatorship under the control
of a few international bankers and oil magnates. This would be
a totalitarian dictatorship very similar to the one Fidel Castro
has successfully tested in Cuba for over half a century on behalf
of his Wall Street masters (more on this in a coming article).
This new global totalitarian dictatorship is what the conspirators
call the New World Order.
Is Pope Francis a Commie?
It is interesting to see that initially the Left accused Pope
Francis of being a Fascist linked to the military in Argentina,
and now the Right is accusing him of being a Communist. Well,
if both the Fascist Left and the Communist Right have a grudge
against Pope Francis, to me that is a sure sign that he is doing
Rush Limbaugh wants make us believe that he is a true defender
of capitalism. But, what type of capitalism does he defend? Mon
and Pop capitalism? No. He is a defender of monopoly capitalism.
To Rush Limbaugh, corporations, particularly transnational corporations,
are the true models of capitalism.
But Limbaugh cannot be more wrong.
Probably the best feature of capitalism is competition. Competition
is the force that makes businesses lower their prices and offer
better products or services. But the ultimate goal of monopoly
capitalism, the type of capitalism favored by big corporations,
is to destroy their competitors. John D. Rockefeller, the inventor
of the trust — a precursor of the corporation — expressed
it very clearly when he affirmed, “Competition is a sin.”
Actually monopoly capitalism is not capitalism at all, but socialism,
either in its Fascist or Communist varieties. Ultimately, Fascism
is the state controlled by the corporations — Benito Mussolini
called Fascism “lo stato corporativo” (the corporate
state), while Communism is the state controlling the corporations.
But we are currently experiencing the birth of the communo-fascist
New World Order, a socio-political aberration in which the state
controls some corporations while some mega-corporations and international
bankers control the state. The NWO comprises the worst characteristics
of both Communism and Fascism.
Why is Rush Limbaugh so intent on defaming Pope Francis? The reason
is simple: the new Pope has refused to be a tool of the New World
Order, and Limbaugh is the NWO’s obedient disinformation
tool.Limbaugh the Disinformer
Probably the most influential among the professional disinformers
whose main job is to confuse the American people and keep them
unable to focus on the real enemy is talk radio host Rush Limbaugh.
I am using Limbaugh as an example, not nly because he is a faux
conservative, but because he is the most important agent in the
two-party PsyOp — a psychological warfare operation whose
goal is to make the American people believe the two main political
parties have diferent agendas.
Rush Limbaugh has always despised the “black helicopter
crowd,” implying that only those afflicted by a peculiar
mental disease could believe or contemplate such claims. He openly
mocked these beliefs in his so-called “Kook Test”:
“Do you believe that David Rockefeller,
Henry Kissinger and other famous members of the New World Order
provide daily instructions to agents of the FBI, CIA, BATF,
and National Organization of Women? Do you believe that the
feminist movement was the brainchild of David Rockefeller for
the purpose of having men and women at war with each other on
a daily basis so as to distract them from the real conspiracy
of the CFR? If you have answered even one of these questions
“yes,” then you are a kook and have passed the test.”
He has been very careful, however, in hiding
from his listeners the fact that in his Memoirs David Rockefeller
himself confirmed that the Rockefeller family is “part of
a secret cabal working against the best interest of the United
States.” He also wrote that he and his family are internationalists
“conspiring with others around the world to build a more
integrated global political and economic structure —one
world, if you will.” Moreover, he added: “If that’s
the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”
In the same fashion, on February 8, 2009, speaking at the at 45th
Munich Conference on Security Policy at the Hotel Bayerischer
Hof, National Security Advisor Major General James Jones, told
those in attendance:
“As the most recent National Security
Advisor of the United States, I take my daily orders from Dr.
Kissinger, filtered down through General Brent Scowcroft and
Sandy Berger, who is also here. We have a chain of command in
the National Security Council that exists today.”
Moreover, Limbaugh has never mentioned that
in July, 2009, in a speech at the opening of the new CFR headquarters
in Washington D.C., just across the street from the State Department,
Hillary acknowledged the fact hat she is a CFR puppet when she
admitted that from then on, “I won’t need that far
to go to be told how we should be doing and what we should think
about the future.”
So, David Rockefeller himself has confessed that he is conspirirng
with other around the world to radically change it, and two senior
government officials have admitted that they get their orders
from the Council on Foreign relations. So much for Limbaugh’s
But talk radio is a relatively new phenomenon. Actually, the talk
radio’s brainwashing job is a complement to the excellent
brainwashing job that has been carried out for many long years
by the American mainstream media. However, if one is to believe
Rush Limbaugh, the mainstream media in under the control of the
Left. He fails to mention, though, that the U.S. mainstream media
is owned by the Right, which means that if they allow their leftist
employees to control the information it is only because it benefits
the owners’ secret agenda.
Limbaugh the Brainwasher
I always refer to Rush Limbaugh as “disinformer extraordinaire,”
because he is by far one of the best. How can we positively identify
a professional disinformer? It is relatively easy. Look for these
two signs: constant repetition and inconsistency.
One of the favored brainwashing techniques used by professional
disinformers —which also allow us to identify them—
is constant repetition. They repeat a few key concepts over and
over until they are embedded in the target’s unconscious
mind. Once it is done, the target will think that the ideas are
his, without realizing that they have been implanted in his mind.
This technique was successfully used by Hitler through radio and
by Castro through television. And constant repetition is one of
the main characteristics of Limbaugh’s radio show. Just
listening to him for half an hour you will hear the words “conservatives,”
“Republicans,” “liberals,” and “Democrats,”
repeated over and over dozens of times. Another words repeated
over and over are “administration,” as in “the
Obama administration” or “the Bush administration,”
“bipartisan,” and “both sides of the aisle.”
To professional brainwasher Limbaugh everything is just a matter
of partisan politics, and the only parties he mentions in his
program are the two factions of the Repucratic Party. He sometimes
mentions the Tea Party, but the Tea Party is just a faction of
the Republican Party.
Another clear sign that we are facing a professional disinformer
is inconsistency. Disagreement is part of the democratic, civilized
way of living. The expression of contradictory points of view
by different individuals is strong evidence of freedom and a very
healthy feature of a democratic republic. Also, we need to acknowledge
the fact that sometimes people change their points of view with
the passage of time.
What is not acceptable, however, are contradictory points of view
expressed by the same individual at the same time. It is precisely
because of their inconsistency why most people don’t like
politicians. Inconsistency is the mark of the opportunist and
the liar. It is also the mark of the professional disinformer.
It seems that the worldview of Limbaugh and the rest of the disinformers
like him is reduced to the narrow field of partisan politics (bipartisan
politics actually means Council of Foreign Relations-controlled
politics). Anything else that cannot be explained by partisan
politics apparently is irrelevant to Rush. He never tries even
to explain is why, despite of all the partisan rhetoric, when
it gets in power the new “administration” never even
tries to undo the bad things made by the previous “administration.”
On the contrary, what we see is a seamless continuation of the
same disastrous anti-American policies.
Also, you never hear in any of Limbaugh programs the words “New
World Order,” “North American Union,” or “Council
on Foreign Relations.” And when a caller begins questioning
the government’s actions during 9/11, he is cut short and
called a leftist loony.
It is interesting to notice that, though Limbaugh and other disinformers
of the Right call themselves conservatives, they evidence the
belief in one of the most obnoxious characteristics of the liberal’s
ideology: situational ethics, which is just a fancy name for moral
True conservatives are not supposed to believe in moral relativism.
To them, some actions are right or wrong disregarding the political
affiliation of the perpetrator. To faux conservatives like Limbaugh
and most of his listeners, however, an action is right or wrong
depending of the political affiliation of the person who carries
Limbaugh practically ignored the existence of Ron Paul during
his presidential campaign, and only mentioned Dr. Paul to criticize
him. Also, Constitution Party candidate Chuck Baldwin was nonexistent
to Limbaugh. On the other hand, he gave lots of coverage to John
McCain, who played the same treasonous role Gore and Kerry played
in previous presidential campaigns. By the way, it is not a coincidence
that the three of them, Gore, Kerry, and McCain, are proud members
of the treasonous Council on Foreign relations.
When George W. Bush’s treasonous activities against this
country became so blatantly obvious that it was becoming impossible
to ignore them —his attitude towards illegal immigration
was probably the most notorious—, even some of the minor
brainwashers like Sean Hannity began criticizing him a little
bit. But not Rush Limbaugh. He was adamant. Everything that meant
even the slightest criticism of George W. Bush was and still is
anathema for him.
1. See, Elias Isquith, “Rush Limbaugh: The Pope Sounds Like
a Marxist,” Salon.com, November 29, 2013, http://www.salon.com/2013/11/27/rush_limbaugh_the_pope_sounds_like_a_marxist/
2. Some people believe that both Clinton Roosevelt’s Science
and Karl Marx’s Manifesto were plagiarized from yet an earlier
eighteenth century collection of writings by Adam Weishaupt, and
that Roosevelt simply picked up the torch and passed it on to
Marx, but that’s another story.]
3. Look for the first issue of my political satire comic OBSERVANDO,
titled “American Inventors,” to appear in January,
2014. There will be a version for the Apple iPad and a .pdf version
to read on all tablets and ßcomputers.
4. David Rockefeller, Memoirs (New York: Random House, 2002),
Limbaugh: A Roosevelist in the Closet? - Part II
By Servando Gonzalez
A Department of Homeland Security Report dated
April 7 2009, titled “Right-wing Extremism: Current Economic
and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and
Recruitment,” warned members of the DHS about the possibility
of violence by “right-wing extremists,” who are identified
as people concerned about illegal immigration, abortion rights,
increasing federal power, restrictions on firearms, abortion and
the loss of U.S. sovereignty. These are considered extremists
capable of carrying out violent attacks.
The Homeland Security Report was actually a sort of follow up
on a previous Report by the Missouri Information Analysis Center.
It linked conservative groups, like followers of presidential
candidates Ron Paul, Chuck Baldwin, Bob Barr, the so-called patriot
movement, and people who oppose the North American Union and the
New World Order, to domestic terrorism. It is not a coincidence
that the Missouri IAC Report was compiled with the assistance
of the Department of Homeland Security.
The Dog That Didn’t Bark
The most important thing about the Report, however, is not the
people it mentions, but the ones it doesn’t. Like in Sherlock
Holmes’ famous novel, the dog that didn’t bark is
an important clue to decipher the mystery. In this case, it is
also a useful tool to identify some prominent traitors.
For example, it is an important clue that Rush Limbaugh is not
mentioned in these reports. Allegedly Limbaugh is a right wing
conservative, and apparently he had turned into the Obama Administration’s
Public Enemy Number One, to the point that Obama himself openly
criticized him several times.
Limbaugh even reached the cover of Newsweek magazine,
who depicted him as a right-wing extremist. But, despite all of
this, he is not mentioned in the DHS Report. Nor is mentioned
Limbaugh’s alter ego, Sean Hannity, also the target of Obama’s
criticisms. Why this important omission?
Very simple: because, despite their claims to the contrary, Limbaugh
does not represent a real threat to the globalist conspirators’
plans. The conspirators only fear true American patriots like
Ron Paul, Chuck Baldwin, Bob Barr and returning military veterans
—the ones who some day may decide to tip over the rotten
apple cart in this country
Actually Rush Limbaugh on the “conservative” side
of the Repucratic coin, as well as Amy Goodman on the “liberal,”
Democratic one, play an important role in this ongoing psychological
warfare operation currently being waged by the globalist conspirators
against the American people.
The Two-Party PsyOp
A measure of the importance of the role these professional disinformers
play in this ongoing two-party PSYOP was unintentionally revealed
some years ago, when Obama himself had to come to the rescue of
none other than his archenemy Rush Limbaugh.
Rush Limbaugh highly praised the appointment of Hillary Clinton
as secretary of state, and qualified Obama’s decision as
“brilliant.” As a way of payment, Obama publicly criticized
Limbaugh, in a subtle effort to strengthen his damaged bona fides
vis-à-vis a growing number of his disenchanted listeners,
who have growing suspicions that the radio host is not what he
claims to be.
As the saying goes, you can only fool some of the people some
of the time, and some of Limbaugh’s listeners apparently
smelled a rat. Finally they had realized that both Bush and the
Republican Party had betrayed them and were defecting in drones
to join the tea parties and other non-controlled political groups.
Most of Limbaugh listeners apparently have lost their capacity
for thinking by themselves —no wonder they proudly call
themselves “ditto-heads.” Nevertheless, during the
final months of Bush’s ignominious regime, more and more
well-informed true conservative listeners were giving Limbaugh
a hard time. They were expressing their concern for unchecked
federal spending policies and even questioning Bush’s treasonous
behavior on immigration, only to be summarily cut out of the air
The fact that many of his listeners were defecting may have shown
on Limbaugh’s diminishing ratings, something that must have
worried the CFR disinformers. So, the conspirators sent their
puppet Obama to rescue their puppet Limbaugh by openly criticizing
him and elevating Limbaugh to leader of the opposition.
Immediately, perhaps based on the belief that the enemy of my
enemy by force has to be my friend, the anti-Obama listeners came
back to the Limbaugh’s program to get their daily doses
of disinformation. Most likely they ignored the fact that the
pseudo-enemy of my enemy is not necessarily my friend. Nevertheless,
the conspirators’ strategy worked to perfection: after Obama
criticized him, Limbaugh’s ratings surged. Rush himself
recognized the fact when he admitted that recent efforts by the
Obama administration to demonize him actually helped his show
by raising his audience 32 percent.
I have brought up the case or Rush Limbaugh not because I have
any special grudge against him. On the contrary, radio being my
first profession and one I still love, I admire him professionally.
Rush Limbaugh was the man who created conservative talk radio
Living in California, I mostly used to listen to Public Radio
(which in my mind I had dubbed “Radio Moscow”) until
one day I discovered Rush on a local AM station (which some years
later I dubbed “Radio Berlin”) and I became one of
his listeners. But these were the times when Bill Clinton was
in the White House, and Rush was very convincing. As soon as W.
Bush became president, however, Rush lost most of his edge.
Initially Rush Limbaugh was a true watchdog, playing the critical
role the mainstream media had deserted. But at some time in his
successful career, Rush became part of the mainstream media —when
you can claim to have more than ten million listeners, you are
mainstream media, like it or not— and the CFR conspirators
don’t like having loose cannons in the mainstream media.
I am not going to speculate why Limbaugh and many others like
him betrayed the American people by choosing to work as brainwashers
for the CFR conspirators instead of serving their country. I remember,
however, that a few years ago Rush had a problem related to overuse
of prescription drugs, and also that some time later he signed
an eight-year contract for 200 million dollars. As the saying
goes in Latin America: “A los periodistas se les pega o
se les paga” —“Journalists: you either hit them
or buy them”—, and, contrary to what most Americans
may think, here in the U.S. things are not too different.
Is Pope Francis a Commie as Rush Limbaugh Claims?
Pope Francis has denied that he is a Marxist. Moreover, the
fact that he is a critic of globalization and the “new tyranny”
practiced by transnational corporations does not make him one.
Neither he is a critic of capitalism.
His Apostolic Exhortation Evangeli Gaudium, with his
call to global leaders to act on global poverty and growing inequality
has nothing to do with the promotion of Communism. On the contrary,
a close reading of Pope Francis Exhortation shows that it is actually
anti-communo-fascist — a sort of anti-New World Order Manifesto.
This explains why the globalist conspirators have mobilized their
disinformers on the Left and the Right against the Pope.
Not even Pope Francis’ declaration that he knows a lot of
“good” Marxists can prove that he is a Marxist. I
know some good Republicans, Democrats and even Tea Partiers, and
it does not mean that I am one of them or that I approve their
political ideas, but only that I think they are not bad people,
just ideologically confused. And most Republicans and Tea Partiers
are ideologically confused, mostly thanks to the brainwashing
job of professional disinformers such as Rush Limbaugh.
Do you think that all Republicans know the secret goals of the
Republican Party? Do you think that all Democrats are aware of
the secret goals of the Democratic Party? Do you think that most
Occupy Wall Street activists knew that CFR agent George Soros
was bankrolling their movement? I don’t think so. In the
same fashion, many members of the American Communist Party would
be shocked if they discovered that Communism is not only a creation
of some the most reactionary international bankers, but also that
these same bankers have been the ones secretly bankrolling the
Actually, Many American patriots have suspected the existence
of a communist conspiracy at the higher levels of the U.S. government.
But, eventually, some of them discovered the true source of treason.
At least a senior member of the John Birch Society, who for many
years had been blaming the Communists for many acts of treason
against the American people, reached the conclusion that Communism
was just a smokescreen to hide the CFR conspirators’ treasonous
activities. This was the case of William J. Jasper, a Senior Editor
of The New American, the John Birch Society’s organ.
In an introductory article to an issue of the magazine fully devoted
“to present the truth about the Conspiracy and the Conspirators,
and their goals, strategy and tactics …”, Jasper mentions
the case of Bella Dodd, a member of the National Committee of
the Communist Party U.S.A. who left the party and became an ardent
anti-Communist, as saying, “I think that the Communist conspiracy
is merely a branch of the much bigger conspiracy.” Jasper
also mentions that in his essay The Truth in Our Time, Robert
Welch, founder of the JBS, stated, “the Communist movement
is only a tool of the total conspiracy.”
It seems that to Rush Limbaugh any mention of the growing gap
between the mega rich and the hyper poor, the loss of individual
freedom, the invasion of privacy and the growing police state
is nothing but a leftist myth. Unfortunately, it is not. Actually,
it is tragic reality. A reality as the result of the implementation
of the New World Order, a sort of neo-feudalism with just two
social classes, the masters and the serfs — a real-life
“Hunger Games” that world bankers and transnational
corporations are pushing down our throats — with help of
both the Left and the Right.
Transnational corporations have no ideology, principles, virtues,
scruples, ethics or morals. Their only purpose is to maximize
the profits of their shareholders — by any means, even if
it requires outsourcing jobs, using child labor in Third World
countries’ sweatshops, destroying small farmers with their
use of genetically modified seeds, killing people with their prescription
drugs, or hiding from the people true sources of cheap power.
All of these actions go against the Catholic Church’s doctrines
— at least in theory. No wonder Pope Francis is against
The bottom line is that currently there is not enough evidence
to prove that Pope Francis is a Communist — which does not
mean that tomorrow the evidence can’t appear. Anyway, if
the evidence surfaces, I would be the first to be surprised, because
the Catholic Church has always been more akin to fascism than
to communism  — which explains the Vatican’s unashamed
love not only for Hitler, Mussolini and Franco, but also for the
fascist tyrant in Cuba. On the other hand, there are no doubts
whatsoever that Rush Limbaugh and his fellow disinformers are
nothing but communo-fascist mouthpieces serving the anti-American
interest of the New World Order globalist conspirators.
1. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Office of Intelligence
and Analysis, Assessment, “Right-wing Extremism: Current
Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization
and Recruitment,” April 7, 2009.
2. See, Kurt Nimmo, “Secret State Police Report: Ron Paul,
Bob Barr, Chuck Baldwin, Libertarians are Terrorists,” Infowars.com.
March 11, 2009, http://www.infowars.com/secret-state-police-report-ron-paul-bob-barr-chuck-baldwin-libertarians-are-terrorists/.
3. See, Tim Shipman, “Barack Obama picks a fight with Rush
Limbaugh as bipartisan spirit crumbles,” Telegraph.co.uk,
January 24, 2009, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/barackobama/4331839/Barack-Obama-picks-a-fight-with-Rush-Limbaugh-as-bipartisan-spirit-crumbles.html.
4. See, Joe Kovacs, “The Right Stuff,” WorldNetDaily,
March 11, 2009, http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=91390.
5. See, Damian Sofsian, Conservative Radio Host's Prescription
Drug Addiction Story, EzineArticles.com, http://ezinearticles.com/?Conservative-Radio-Hosts-Prescription-Drug-Addiction-Story&id=74378.
6. See, “Right Wing Radio Host Rush Limbaugh Signs 200 Million
Dollar deal,” M&G News, July 2, 2008, http://www.monstersandcritics.com/news/usa/news/article_1414676.php/Right_wing_radio_host_Rush_Limbaugh_signs_400_million_dollar_deal.
7. See, “Pope Francis says he is no Marxist, AFP, December
15, 2013, http://news.yahoo.com/pope-francis-says-no-marxist-094958904.html.
8. See, Katie McDonough, “Pope Francis: Capitalism ‘a
new tyranny,’” Salon.com, November 26, 2013, http://www.salon.com/2013/11/26/pope_francis_capitalism_is_a_new_tyranny/.
Contrary the misleading title of this article, the word “capitalism”
does not appear in the Pope Francis “Apostolic Exhortation.”
9. See, http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/francesco/apost_exhortations/documents/papa-francesco_esortazione-ap_20131124_evangelii-gaudium_en.html#SOME_CHALLENGES_OF_TODAY%E2%80%99S_WORLD.
10. William F. Jasper, “Conspiracy: Where’s the Proof?,”
The New American, Vol. 12, No. 19 (September 16, 1996), pp. 5-10.
12. According to recent statistics, 74 percent of all the wealth
in the United States is owned by the wealthiest 10 percent of
all Americans. See, Michael Snyder, “83 Numbers From 2013
That Are Almost Too Crazy To Believe,” Infowars. Com, December
17, 2013, http://www.infowars.com/83-numbers-from-2013-that-are-almost-too-crazy-to-believe/
13. Actually, Liberation Theology is not Marxism, but Jesuit fascism
in disguise. See, Malachi Martin, The Jesuits: The Society of
Jesus and the Betrayal of the Catholic Church ( New York: Simon
& Schuster, 19870).
Servando Gonzalez, is a Cuban-born American writer,
historian, semiologist and intelligence analyst. He has written
books, essays and articles on Latin American history, intelligence,
espionage, and semiotics. Servando is the author of Historia
herética de la revolución fidelista, Observando,
Secret Fidel Castro: Deconstructing the Symbol, The
Nuclear Deception: Nikita Khrushchev and the Cuban Missile Crisis
madre de todas las conspiraciones: Una novela de ideas subversivas,
all available at Amazon.com.
He also hosted the documentaries Treason in America: The Council
on Foreign Relations and Partners in Treason: The CFR-CIA-Castro
Connection, produced by Xzault Media Group of San Leandro,
California, both available at the author's site at http://www.servandogonzalez.org.
His book, Psychological Warfare and the New
World Order: The Secret War Against the American People is
available at Amazon.com.
Or download a
.pdf copy of the book you can read on your computer, iPad,
Nook, Kindle or any other tablet. His book, OBAMANIA:
The New Puppet and His Masters, is available at Amazon.com.
Servando's book (in Spanish) La CIA, Fidel Castro, el Bogotazo
y el Nuevo Orden Mundial, appeared last year, and is available
and other bookstores online.
His most recent book, I
Dare Call It treason: The Council on Foreign Relations and the
Betrayal of the America, juste appeared and is available
at Amazon.com and other bookstores online.
Servando's two most recent books in digital versions
only are The
Swastika and the Nazis: A Study of the Misuse of the Swastika
by the Nazis and the first issue of the political satire series