by Servando Gonzalez
Copyright © 2011. All rights reserved.
A recent article in USA Today raises the question if
the developments in Libya show Obama’s overall approach
to foreign policy and the beginning of what properly might be
called “The Obama Doctrine.” Well, if Obama’s
approach to foreign policy can be called a doctrine, it could
easily be defined in these terms: “I will use the full power
of the CIA and the U.S. military to steal the resources of any
country who opposes the intrusion of Wall Street bankers, oil
magnates and transnational corporations.” However, isn’t
this exactly what American presidents have been doing since Woodrow
On the other hand, given the fact that most doctrines attributed
to American presidents have actually been written at the Harold
Pratt House by the Rockefellers and other members of the dreaded
Council of Foreign Relations — the true government of the
United States —, and implanted in the president’s
minds by their CFR-controlled advisors, should we properly call
them “presidential doctrines?”
Of these, probably one of the most obvious examples of policies
whose only purpose is to protect the rapacity of Wall Street bankers
and transnational corporations is the U.S. policy document “National
Security Strategy of the United States,” also known as
the Bush Doctrine, released in September 2002. Its most radical
postulate is a new preemptive strikes policy, which is nothing
but an even more aggressive approach toward countries that get
in the way of the CFR’s Wall Street Mafia.
However, further proof that the so-called war on terror was planned
way before September 11, 201, is that the “National Security
Strategy” is based on two papers dating back to the early
1990s: one is a 1992 internal government document entitled “Defense
Planning Guidance,” authored by then Secretary of Defense
Dick Cheney (CFR) and his deputy Paul Wolfowitz (CFR), which contemplated
the use of military force against any nation the conspirators
perceived to be hostile against their interests. The other one
is the report “Rebuilding America’s Defenses,”
released in September 2000 by the Project for the New American
Century, a neocon think tank composed almost exclusively of CFR
Typical of these CFR-created presidential “doctrines”
is George Kennan’s (CFR) 1947 article in Foreign Affairs,
written under the pseudonym “X,” explaining his —actually
the CFR conspirators’— theory of “containment.”
According to Kennan, the U.S. role in the coming Cold War should
be limited to containing the expansion of Soviet Communism, not
fighting to reverse or defeat this expansion. Soon after, President
Truman made Containment the core of “his” Truman Doctrine.
Probably one of the most overused adjectives attached to American
presidents is “Wilsonian,” honoring the alleged creator
of the League of Nations, the Thirteen Points, and many other
aberrations that, luckily, ended up in failure. Unfortunately,
we are still suffering from “his” creation of the
Federal Reserve Bank and the Internal Revenue Service, the two
U.S. government institutions that have stolen more money from
the pockets of American citizens than thieves and gangsters.
Nevertheless, Wilsonianism has become a sort of recurring curse
of American politics. In an address to the United States Senate
in three parts, June 29, June 30 and July 1, 1992, “On the
Threshold of the New World Order: The Wilsonian Vision and American
Foreign Policy in the 1990's and Beyond,” then Senator Joseph
R. Biden, a proud member of the Council on Foreign Relations,
When the peace conference convened at Versailles
in 1919, Woodrow Wilson presented, to a world desperately eager
to hear it, America’s second vision of a new order. The
first American vision —the Founders’ vision—
had concerned the establishment of a just new order within nations
through institutions of democracy. The second American vision
—Wilson's vision— concerned the establishment of
a just new order among nations through institutions of cooperation.
. . .
Modern-day conservatives who are instinctively frightened by
the Wilsonian vision have propounded a mythical image of Woodrow
Wilson as a dangerously naive idealist. Idealist he was. But
there was no naivete in the Wilsonian vision. As history soon
proved the danger lay in a failure to implement what Wilson
. . .
How is it, then, that the United States failed so conspicuously
and so fatefully to join the League of Nations that Woodrow
Wilson himself had designed and advanced as the ultimate protection
against future cynicism and future cataclysm?
. . .
With that turn of history, the League of Nations was doomed
and a new world was born, but not a new world order.
. . .
Now, as the century nears it close, the near-universal repudiation
of the totalitarian idea has removed the last great obstacle
to the Wilsonian vision.
What CFR agent Joseph Biden did not say, however,
was how this “near-universal repudiation of the totalitarian
idea” could actually bring about the totalitarian, communo-fascist
“Wilsonian vision” of Edward Mandell House. Apparently
Biden ignores, or wants us to ignore, that Wilson had no ideas
of his own. All of them had been implanted in his feeble brain
by his controller, Col. Edward Mandell House, an agent for the
Rothschild-Warburg-Rockefeller banking cartel (gang) and founder
of the Council on Foreign Relations. Wilson himself publicly admitted
it when he said, “Mr. House is my second personality. He
is my independent self. His thoughts and mine are one.”
The most important documents in the history of the U.S. since
the beginning of the past century, like Wilson’s Fourteen
Points, the League of Nations, the Federal Reserve Bank, the Federal
Income Tax, the Lend Lease, the Containment Doctrine, the Marshall
Plan, the National Security Act that created the CIA, the Alliance
for Progress, FEMA, as well as the nefarious Patriot Act the
Office of Homeland Security and the Transportation Security Administration,
up to Obamacare, have been written by CFR Conspirators at the
Harold Pratt House in Manhattan and placed on the President’s
desk for him to sign.
For example, though generally attributed to JFK, actually the
first person who mentioned the Alliance for Progress was CFR secret
agent Fidel Castro. On May 2, 1959, during a session of the Economic
Assembly of the Latin American States, Castro suggested that,
in order to avoid problems in Latin America, the U.S. should help
the Latin American countries economically through the creation
of a common market. Next month, during a speech at New York’s
Central Park, he called for an American “Marshall Plan”
for Latin America in order to avoid communism.
As expected, Castro’s suggestions were received with laughter
and contempt. But less than two years later, President Kennedy
created his Alliance for Progress, pledging $10 billion for the
first ten years. Later, President Johnson promised another $10
billion to continue the program. And less than ten years later,
in the spring of 1967, a hemispheric conference was held in Uruguay
where the decision was made for the creation of a Latin American
common market. Incredibly, both of the apparently far-fetched
suggestions Castro made eventually became a reality — which
does not prove that Castro has extraordinary powers of clairvoyance,
but that he gets his marching orders from some Wall Street bankers,
particularly the Rockefellers.
Despite of the use of the Wilsonian (actually Housian) rhetoric
of intervening militarily for humanitarian purposes or to enlarge
the community of democratic, free-market nations, Obama’s
foreign policy is nothing but a rehash of the naked imperialistic
policy exposed in a 1992 Department of Defense planing document
drafted at the Harold Pratt House by then-Under secretary of Defense
for George W, Bush, Paul Wolfowitz (CFR). The document laid out
in extremely blunt and arrogant language the need for a unipolar
world under full spectrum dominance by Wall Street bankers and
transnational corporations using the U.S. military as their obedient
tool to coerce and intimidate the whole world.
A few years later, in September 2000, the Department of Defense
document materialized again in the Report “Rebuilding America’s
Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources For a New Century,”
produced by a neocon organization called the Project for the New
American Century (PNAC). Key PNAC members who wrote the Report
were Richard Cheney, Paul Wolfowitz, Norman Podhoretz, Richard
Perle, Lewis “Scooter” Libby, John Bolton, Elliot
Abrams, and Robert Kagan, all of them CFR agents.
In synthesis, the Report called for an era of open, uncontested
global American imperialism based on brute military force. Because
of the openness and cynicism in the way it told the world the
course of action the conspirators will follow, some people have
compared the PNAC Report to Hitler’s Mein Kampf.
Actually, the plan to surreptitiously invade Libya and other countries
is not new. It was mentioned by NATO commander Wesley Clark (CFR)
during a speech he gave at the University of Alabama in October
of 2006. According to Clark, a general at the Pentagon told him
that they had plans to invade seven countries in five years, “starting
with Iraq, then Syria, Lebanon, then Libya, Somalia, Sudan, then
we’re going to come back and get Iran in five years.”
And the best part of it is that the Wall Street Bankers’
Wilsonian-Housian-Rockefellerian vision of a new world order under
their control is for free, because we the people are the ones
paying the U.S. armed forces and the CIA to impose it upon the
weak nations of the world. Therefore, if you are a Wall Street
banker, oil magnate or CEO of a transnational corporation, the
least you can do is to thank every single member of the U.S. military
and the CIA for the good job they are doing protecting your interests
Obama’s main campaign theme was that of Change. However,
after close to the end of his third year as a temporary resident
of the White House (he spends most of this time vacationing) the
only thing that has changed is that he has not only continued
all warfare programs of the Bush era, but has expanded and intensified
them. Consequently, if Obama has put forward something close
to a presidential doctrine, we can only call it Obama’s
“Lack of Change” doctrine. Or, even better, the
Somebody said that the only thing that doesn’t change is
change itself. However, the only thing that doesn’t seem
to change in Washington, D.C., is lack of change.
. Michael O’Hanlon, “Is Libya a Policy Cornerstone
of an Obama Doctrine?,” USA Today, August 29, 2011,
 National Security Strategy of the United States, The White
House, September 20, 2002.
 Wilson quoted in Charles Seymour, The Intimate Papers
of Colonel House (New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1926), vol.
I, pp. 114-115.
 The Containment Doctrine was first expressed by CFR agent
George Kennan in the famous article he wrote for Foreign Affairs
under the synonym “X,” and later polished by the CFR’s
“Wise Men.” See Evan Thomas, The Very Best Men:
The Daring Early Years of the CIA (New York: Simon and Schuster,
2006), pp. 9, 29.
 The Marshall Plan was actually written by CFR secret agent
Richard Bissell. See, Walter Isaacson and Evan Thomas (1986) The
Wise Men: Six Friends and the World They Made: Acheson, Bohlen,
Harriman, Kennan, Lovett, and McCloy (New York: Simon &
Schuster, 1986 p. 10.
 Bush’s Patriot Act was just a version on steroids of
Clinton’s Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act
of 1996, passed one year after the Oklahoma City bombing. The
Act gave the attorney general the power to use the U.S. armed
forces against American citizens, nullifying the Posse Comitatus
Act of 1878, as well as selectively suspending habeas corpus,
the keystone of Anglo-American liberty.
 See, Herbert Matthews, Fidel Castro (New York: Simon
and Schuster, 1969), pp. 166-167.
 See, Hispanic American Report, Vol. XII, (No. 4,
1959), p. 205.
 Kurt Nimmo, “Libya and Syria: The Neocon Plan to Attack
Seven Countries in Five Years,” Infowars.com, September
 See, J.D. Heyes, “CIA lawyer says Obama administration
backed and continued virtually all Bush-era programs,” Infowars.com,
September 7, 2011, http://www.infowars.com/cia-lawyer-says-obama-administration-backed-and-continued-virtually-all-bush-era-programs/
 To see my theory that perhaps Obama is just implementing
a plan set up by Col. Edward Mandell House in 1912, see Servando
Gonzalez, Obamania: The New Puppet and His Masters (Oakland,
California: Spooks Books, 2011), Chapter 2, Barack Obama, Administrator,
Servando Gonzalez is a Cuban-born American writer, semiologist
and intelligence analyst. He has written books, essays and articles
on Latin American history, intelligence, espionage, and semiotics.
Servando is the author of Historia herética de la revolución
fidelista, The Secret Fidel Castro, The Nuclear Deception
and La madre de todas las conspiraciones, all available
He also hosted the documentaries Treason in America: The Council
on Foreign Relations and Partners in Treason: The CFR-CIA-Castro
Connection, produced by Xzault Media Group of San Leandro,
California, both available at the author's site at http://www.servandogonzalez.org.
His latest book, Psychological Warfare and the New World Order:
The Secret War Against the American People just appeared
and is available at Amazon.com.
Or download a
.pdf copy of the book you can read on your computer or i-Pad.
Servando's new book, OBAMANIA: The New Puppet
and His Masters, is already available at Amazon.com.