Gay? Of Course!
By Servando Gonzalez
If one is to believe the American brainwashing
machine (aka, mainstream media, the presstitutes, etc.), we have
currently in the White House the first gay president. Now, though
the fact that Obama is gay is undeniable, the most important
thing about this information is that nowhere in the barrage of
articles lauding Obama for his change of mind do its authors mention
the word most commonly associated with the term gay: “homosexual.”
By their omission, these authors have made clear that they don’t
imply that, though Obama is gay, he is also a homosexual.
In their rush to back the Obama-gay campaign — actually
a psychological warfare operation (PSYOP) most likely created
by the Council on Foreign Relations conspirators for a particular
reason I’ll explain below— the lackeys in the mainstream
press have made a gross mistake by unwittingly revealing the gay
movement’s best kept secret: that gay and homosexual are
This is a typical case of the law of unintended consequences.
Fortunately, in this case it has worked in the favor of We The
Though for political reasons gay leaders and propagandists use
the terms “gay” and “homosexual” as synonyms,
the terms in fact denote two very different things. The confusion
is not the product of chance, but of a carefully designed disinformation
campaign (PSYOP) developed by the American gay movement with the
secret help of very powerful people, who have used it as a smokescreen
to hide its true nature. But gay and homosexual are not synonyms.
As a matter of fact, the terms denote two very different phenomena,
and the distinction is not mere linguistic.
To prove my case I’ll cite two examples from recent history.
In recent times, only two countries in the world have harassed,
persecuted and interned homosexuals in concentration camps: Nazi
Germany and Castro’s Cuba. But there is a less known fact:
both Hitler and Castro were surrounded by a coterie of homosexuals.
Ernst Roehm, Rudolf Hess, Reinhard Heydrich, and even Hitler’s
driver, Emil Maurice, were well-known homosexuals. In the same
fashion, Castro’s close friend Alfredo Guevara (no relation
to Che) and his brother Raúl, just to mention two of the
most notorious ones, are well-known homosexuals. But neither
in Germany, nor in Cuba, were those homosexuals close to power
harassed, persecuted or sent to concentration camps. On the contrary,
some of these homosexuals played a key role in sending other homosexuals
to concentration camps.
Obviously, both in Cuba and Germany there were two different types
of homosexuals. Some of them were the targets of the rage of the
government, while others were protected from it. Some of these
homosexuals were victims, while other were victimizers. So, who
were the lucky ones not sent to concentration camps?
Were they the fat ones? The vegetarians? The ones who practiced
a particular type of homosexual sex? No. The protected ones were
the militant homosexuals who actively supported the government.
Both in Castro’s Cuba and Hitler’s Germany there were
two quite distinct types of homosexuals, and the difference was
not sexual but political: A homosexual is a person who has sex
with persons of his/her own sex. The term gay, on the contrary,
is political, and does not refer to any specific sexual practice.
It denotes a militant homosexual, a member of an action organization,
actively engaged in activities to advance a particular agenda
in the political sphere. Actually, the process of “coming
out of the closet,” by which a person tells to the world
that he is gay, is basically not a sexual but a political act.
The difference between these two types of homosexuals is so obvious
that some researchers already created names to distinguish them.
As early as 1945, German historian Samuel Igra called these militant
homosexuals “homosexualists.” More recently, author
Judith Riesman calls them “homosexists.” I simply
call them by the term they themselves coined to disguise their
true nature: gays.
According to the gay movement’s disinformation story, the
term “gay” was created to counteract the negative
connotations attached to the term “homosexual.” But,
contrary to their claims, homosexual and heterosexual have always
been neutral terms, with no negative connotations whatsoever.
Proof of it is that the gay movement keeps using the term bisexual.
Actually, the term gay —most likely a creation of the Tavistock
Institute, the Stanford Research Institute, or some other of the
conspirators’ psychological warfare think tanks —
was specifically coined to create cognitive dissonance: far from
being lighthearted, carefree, cheerful, showy, brilliant —
which aptly designates the widespread stereotyped image of effeminate
homosexuals — the core of the men who call themselves “gays”
belong to the “butch” type of virile, tough, aggressive,
warmongering, Spartan macho homosexuals who are everything but
gay in the original meaning of the word.
For the “butch,” macho gays, young
attractive boys are the most desirable option for sexual pleasure,
while heterosexual males, feminine women and effeminate homosexuals,
are regarded in this order as progressively inferior.
However, though most gays are actually homosexuals, not all homosexuals
are necessarily gays. Actually, despite the fact that, as a
result of cultural imperialism, most homosexuals in Latin America
jumped on the gay bandwagon and now call themselves “gays,”
the concept is totally alien to the Hispanic culture. The reason
for this is that in Latin America homosexuality had never been
politicized — until now.
But, blinded by the massive propaganda campaign pushing the gay
agenda —which is actually a subset of the New World Order
conspirators’ agenda — most homosexuals around the
world began calling themselves gays. They have never suspected
that had been recruited under a false flag.
Moreover, as Obama’s recent declaration has proved beyond
any doubt, the term “gay” properly includes all types
of people, homosexuals or not, who, in one way or another, out
of conviction, fear or opportunism, actively support and advance
the gay political agenda — which is very close to the CFR
Accordingly, Bill Clinton, who has always actively supported the
gay movement’s agenda, can be properly called gay. For the
same reason, Camille Paglia, a known lesbian who does not support
the gay agenda, cannot be properly called gay — which explains
why gays hate her. 
In the same fashion, millions of homosexuals around the world,
particularly in Third World countries, who do not support the
gay agenda and have no intention of making a political statement
by coming out of a closet they have never been in by openly proclaiming
their homosexuality, cannot be properly called gays. Obviously,
“gay” is a political term, while “homosexual”
is a sociological one. The fact that some gays are homosexuals
does not mean that the terms are interchangeable.
Though most people, including most homosexuals, erroneously use
the terms as synonyms, the distinction between gay and homosexual
is of cardinal importance to understand the essence of the gay
phenomenon. As a matter of fact, the American gay movement is
fully aware of the distinction, and uses the terms as synonyms
for their own ideological purposes, as a way to distort reality.
The fact that “gay” and “homosexual” are
not synonyms was perhaps the best-kept secret of the gay movement.
Fortunately for us, however, Obama, wittingly or unwittingly,
let the cat out of the bag.
Once this cardinal distinction between gays and homosexuals is
understood, it is relatively easy to understand the otherwise
unexplainable fact that in the early seventies, while the Castro
government was harassing and torturing homosexuals by the thousands
and interning them in concentration camps, many American gays
joined the Venceremos Brigade and traveled to Cuba, allegedly
to work in the sugar crop but actually to give support to the
Castro regime. American gays, who are essentially anti-homosexual,
had no objections to the harassment and torturing of homosexuals
in Castro’s concentration camps.
Under this light, it is easy to understand why San Francisco gays
of the pro-Castro organization “Queers for Cuba,”
boycotted in San Francisco Bay Area theaters the film Before
the Night Falls, based on the autobiography of Cuban writer
and homosexual Reinaldo Arenas. Arenas was one of the thousands
of homosexuals persecuted in Cuba by the Castroist gays and interned
in a concentration camp, who escaped the Island during the Mariel
boatlift of 1980.
It is also easy to understand why when the more than twenty thousand
homosexuals who had escaped from the harassment and persecution
in Castro’s gay paradise arrived in the U.S., the American
gay organizations turned their backs on them. Only religious charitable
organizations, mostly Catholic, gave the Cuban homosexuals a helping
British Fabian socialist Bertrand Russell wrote that, with the
support of the media, the educational system, and the right propaganda
tools, you can make people believe that the snow is black.
A case which proves he was right is that the gay-friendly Latin
American Studies Association (LASA), recently received Mariela
Castro, the daughter of gay Raúl Castro, the main instigator
of the persecution of homosexuals in Cuba, as a hero during its
International Congress in San Francisco last May. Further evidence
that the gay movement has nothing to do with sexuality, but with
politics is that the Panel where Mariela participated was titled
Una mirada a la Diversidad Sexual desde lo Político (A
View at Sexual Diversity From a Political Point of View).
It was not a coincidence that, just a few days before the opening
of the LASA Congress, there were government-sponsored marches
for gay rights in several Cuban cities.
American gay leaders, with the full support of the media presstitutes,
are trying to convince the American people that Cuba, the most
repressive country in the Western Hemisphere, has suddenly become
a heaven for gays. But you have to be very naïve to believe
that in a country where women, blacks, workers, effeminate homosexuals
and practically anybody who does not support the government have
no rights, gays have suddenly become the only ones who have rights
in Cuba. The parade actually shows that, like everywhere in the
world, gays support the oppressors, including their oppression
of homosexuals, which, despite claims to the contrary, still exist
in Castro’s Cuba. Despite the American gay movement’s
claims on the contrary, there’s nothing to be proud about
ignoring the harassment of homosexuals in Castro’s Cuba
and showing their support for their oppressors.
By the way, may it be that the conspirators of the Council on
Foreign Relations with the help of the gay movement are grooming
Mariela Castro for becoming Cuba’s next gay president? That
would be a clever trick for keeping Castroism in Cuba after the
death of the tyrant.
By disguising their political movement behind a cover of a social
one, the gay activists made it immune to criticism. Currently,
in American you can criticize Democrats, Republicans, Libertarians,
Communists, Black Panthers, John Birchers, and other political
organizations in the strongest terms without being called Demophobe,
Republiphobe, Libertophobe, Johnbircherphobe, and the like. But
you cannot criticize the gay movement and their political agenda
without being called “homophobe.” By cleverly disguising
the true nature of their movement, gays have created the first
Kevlar-coated political movement in the U.S., totally immune to
The trick is not an original one. Gay leaders got it from the
Jewish Zionist movement. Zionists cleverly disguised their political
movement as an ethnic one. Despite the fact that not all Jews
are Zionists, nor all Zionists are Jews, any criticism of the
Zionist government of Israel, particularly by a non-Jew, immediately
brings on you the accusation of being “anti-Semite.”
But there are more things about the gay movement difficult to
explain. For example, how has the minuscule gay movement managed
to gain so much political power in the U.S. in such a short time?
The answer is relatively simple: because the gay movement leaders
opportunistically became fellow travelers to the New World Order
conspirators. The two main goals of the conspirators are depopulation
and deindustrialization, and, just after war and abortions, homosexuality
is an excellent depopulation tool.
In 1989 a book with a provocative title: After the Ball: How
America Will Conquer Its Fear and Hatred of Gays in the 90’s,
appeared in the bookstalls of every bookstore in the United States,
though most likely it was read only by gays and gay-friendly people
—precisely the public it intended to reach. The authors’
mini-bios in the book are revealing: Marshall Kirk is a researcher
in neuropsychiatry. Hunter Madsen is an expert on public persuasion
tactics and social marketing.
Despite the innocuous title, the book is an extraordinarily well-designed
war tool: it was a master plan for a psychological warfare operation
against the American people. And the authors were so sure that
it was going to work that they used the future tense will conquer
instead of might conquer in the title of their book.
The authors begin the Introduction with a lapidary phrase: “The
gay revolution has failed.” And it has failed, they
believed, because gays have used the wrong tactics. They have
been too honest, too candid in trying to gain acceptance. In order
to win, they advise, they should use cunning, disinformation and
In their book, Kirk and Madsen mention how fortune, in the form
of a terrible disease, AIDS, miraculously provided gays with an
excellent opportunity to win the battle for the control of the
straights’ feeble minds. According to the book’s authors,
AIDS brought gays an unprecedented public recognition and sympathy.
“AIDS gave us a chance, however brief, to establish ourselves
as a victimized minority legitimately deserving America’s
special protection and care.”
Later, Kirk and Madsen clearly explain what their book is all
The campaign we outline in this book, though
complex, depends centrally upon a program of unabashed propaganda,
firmly grounded in long-established principles of psychology
and advertising. Some readers will be disappointed with the
seemingly tame idea of a propaganda campaign; they rather “storm
the barricades,” . . . Alas —in a way we, too, would
like to storm some barricades, but such tactics have proven
themselves impractical —ineffective or even harmful—
and their day is past. [Emphasis in the original] 
Half through the book, however, the authors reveal
their true game, calling what they have in mind by the right name.
And what they have in mind is not a simple change in attitudes,
but a total conversion. By this, “we actually mean something
far more profoundly threatening the American Way of Life, without
which no truly sweeping social change can occur.” Essentially,
they plan to change “the average American’s emotions,
mind, and will, through a planned psychological attack, in the
form of propaganda fed to the nation via the media.” [Emphasis
In addition, they clarify even more what they want to accomplish,
We have in mind a strategy as calculated and
powerful as that which gays are accused of pursuing by their
enemies —or, if you prefer, a plan as manipulative as
that which our enemies themselves employ. It’s time to
learn from Madison Avenue, to roll out the big guns. Gays
must launch a large-scale campaign —we’ve called
it the Waging Peace campaign— to reach straights though
the mainstream media. We’re taking about propaganda.
[Emphasis in the original] 
What they are describing is nothing but a carefully
planned psychological warfare operation (PSYOP) to wage a secret
war against their enemies, straights, very similar to the one
the CFR conspirators have been successfully waging for many years
against their main enemy, the American people. And a war it is.
In February 1988 a “war conference” of 175 gay activists
convened in Warrenton, Virginia, representing gay organizations
from across the country. The conference established a four-point
agenda for the advancement of the gay movement, giving first priority
to “a nation-wide media campaign to promote a positive image
of gays and lesbians.”
20 years after the book was published the authors’ goals
have been reached and surpassed far beyond their most optimistic
expectations. However, as they cautioned several times in the
book, none of this would have worked without a massive exposure
by flooding the mainstream media. But we know that the mainstream
American media is fully under the control of the CFR conspirators.
Without their support the gay movement would have amount to nothing.
Now, how can we explain that the most reactionary sector of American
society has secretly supported the allegedly “progressive”
gay movement? The answer is very simple: as I mentioned above,
homosexuals don’t procreate, and the promotion of homosexuality
is just another eugenic tool in the conspirators’ plan to
depopulate the planet.
The tacit collaboration between the gay movement leaders and the
CFR conspirators is evidenced by the extraordinary support the
gay movement receives from the CFR-controlled mainstream media
and non-profit foundations. But there is even further proof. The
authors of After the Ball openly advice this collaboration
as a strategy to advance their interests. In one of the sub-chapters,
appropriately entitled “Four Strategy: Political Conspiracies,”
they mention how gay activists, “have concentrated their
efforts on politics, meaning efforts to secure gay rights by conspiring
with liberal elites within the legal and legislative system.”
But the authors also suggest that gay activists should collaborate
not only with the leftist but also with the rightist elite, “The
goal here has been to forge a little entente or conspiracy
with the power elite, to jump ahead of public sentiment or ignore
it altogether.” [Emphasis in the original] 
There are some key characteristics of the gay movement, however,
about which the authors of After the Ball have been disingenuous
simply by totally ignoring them.
The most important feature of gay movement is that it is actually
a political movement, not a social one. As the authors of After
the Ball advice, “wherever possible come out.”
 But there is nothing sexual in coming out. Actually, coming
out is a political statement, and this proves beyond any reasonable
doubt the fact that the gay movement is actually a political movement
cleverly disguised as a social one.
The love and admiration some core gays feel for the Nazis is evidenced
in the “gay pride” parades in San Francisco and other
cities. Those black leather-clad gays sporting Nazi paraphernalia
while openly mimicking all types of sadistic activities are a
clear sign of their Nazi persuasion. Moreover, the CFR-controlled
presstitutes have hidden the fact that most members of neo-Nazi
groups in the U.S. are actually butch, macho gays.
As fellow travelers, gay movement leaders have profited enormously
from their secret alliance with the CFR conspirators, and they
have paid the favor by helping the conspirators perform some of
their dirty games. One of these payments was the gay marriage
PSYOP that helped George W. Bush stay in the White House for a
second term. It seems that the PSYOP worked so well that they
have decided to repeat it.
One of the most unexplainable things about American gays is their
desire to get married in a country where less and less heterosexual
couples are getting married and the institution of marriage is
in decline. Another is that this great desire usually flashes
a few months before a major presidential election where the CFR
conspirators have decided to get a Republican puppet elected,
and quickly fades after it.
This does not mean that most gay couples that married or wanted
to do it were consciously supporting the PSYOP. On the contrary,
I think that most of them were well intentioned and sincerely
believed they were trying to exercise a right that had been denied
to them. But, like in all psychological warfare operations,
the brainwashing works not only in the minds of the target population,
but also in the minds of the ones who unknowingly are part of
the PSYOP. In he field of intelligence and espionage, the phenomenon
is known as people who have been conquered by the enemy’s
propaganda. Most gays who rushed to San Francisco’s City
Hall to get married played the role of patsies —the necessary
In 2004, the CFR conspirators changed their plans to appoint Hillary
Clinton as the next president of the United States and decided
to keep George W. Bush in the White House for 4 more years. But
Bush’s disastrous policies had won the dissatisfaction of
most of his conservative base in the Republican Party, particularly
among Southern Christians. Then, as if on cue, San Francisco gays
felt their pre-election uncontrollable need to get married, and
all hell broke loose —its flames conveniently fanned by
the mainstream media and some CFR-controlled Protestant pastors.
As the result of this Hegelian-type PSYOP, the scared conservatives
were duped, and reluctantly chose Bush again as the lesser of
two evils. Soon after, the frantic gay-marriage advocates
calmed down and dug in back in their holes like cicadas waiting
for the next presidential election.
Some gays who were not part of the PSYOP later complained that
the gay marriage charade actually gave the victory to George W.
Bush. A few months later it was discovered that San Francisco’s
pro-gay mayor Gavin Newsom, the man who supported the whole charade,
had been a contributor to Bush’s 2000 presidential campaign.
Currently, it seems that Obama’s rush to implement the conspirators’
New World Order as soon as possible has backfired. However, fortunately
for us, the American people, Obama unwittingly awakened a sleeping
giant. If you don’t believe me, just ask any gun store owner
and they will tell you how since Obama moved to the White House
their sales have doubled or even tripled.
None other than Zbigniew Brzezinski acknowledged the fact that
the conspirators’ plans are failing, and that they are scared
of the growing awareness of the masses and the dissidence among
their ranks —the rats are the first ones to escape from
a sinking ship. Speaking at a Council on Foreign Relations meeting
in Montreal in early 2010, he warned that a “global political
awakening,” in combination with infighting amongst the elite,
was threatening to derail the move towards a one-world government.
As a result, it seems that the conspirators have decided to get
rid of the present Democratic impostor and move to the White House
a Republican traitor with a big can of lube. As it has become
customary, the CFR conspirators asked for the support of their
good gay friends and the gay marriage cicadas dug out of their
holes and began chirping their insufferable noise. On cue, CFR
agent Biden expressed his pleasure. A few days later, a reluctant
Obama had to bite the bullet and follow his masters’ orders
by joining the discordant chorus.
So, now it seems that we previously had a homosexual President
who was not gay (at least, not openly), who has been replaced
by a gay Impostor who is not homosexual (at least, not openly).
The frustration reflected in Obama’s face when he took the
fateful step of telling the American people his approval of gay
marriage was because he was fully aware that, by doing so, he
had terminated with extreme prejudice his plans to stay four more
years in the White House stealing our money and amassing his growing
fortune. It is not by chance that, coinciding with Obama’s
admission of support for gay marriage, some damaging information
about his true place of birth mysteriously surfaced. Like “Indian
givers,” what the CFR conspirators give, they can take back
away any time.
In a previous article I mentioned that if Ron Paul decides not
to run as an independent, our best choice would be voting for
Obama. This seems anti-intuitive; so let me explain why I think
First of all, nobody can accuse me of being pro-Obama, much less
liberal or Democrat. Even before he was selected by the CFR conspirators
at the Bilderberg meeting in Chantilly, Virginia, in 2008, I expressed
my dislike for the guy — the same way I have expressed my
dislike for George W. Bush, Bill Clinton and George H.W. Bush.
Actually, I don’t like politicians, period. None of them.
But, as a matter of principle, I think that our best strategy
is to do everything the conspirators don’t want, and it
has become evident that the CFR conspirators don’t want
Obama in the White House for a second term. As they expected,
as soon as they forced Obama to declare his support for gay marriage
he automatically lost a large part of the Mexican vote (I don’t
call it the Hispanic vote because some Hispanics, like the Cubans
and the Venezuelans, never voted for Obama) and, not surprisingly,
he also lost a large part of the Black votes. Just a few hours
after Obama declared his gayness, his possibilities of getting
a second term vanished — which means that the CFR-generated
gay marriage PsyOps worked — first time to give Bush a second
term, now to guarantee that Obama doesn’t get one.
Obviously, a second Obama term is not part of the CFR conspirators’
plans to keep screwing us softly with their song. They want to
put the awakening giant to sleep again. Therefore, we should do
anything in our hands to make their plans fail miserably. A Republican
puppet in the White House will be soporific for the American people,
and will send down the drain most of the awakened consciousness
Obama has unwittingly help develop. But just the specter of four
more years of the Impostor in the White House will awake even
the most reluctant Americans, except the most died-in-the-wool
The CFR conspirators are fully aware of this. That’s why
they have decided to do a strategic retreat and install a Republican
in the White House to put Americans to sleep again. By the way,
except for his alleged lack of support for gay marriage, Romney
will be the seamless continuation of the Bush-Clinton-Bush II-Obama’s
policies — which are actually the CFR conspirators’
The time has come to unmask the gay movement and show what it
really is: a political movement hiding behind the cover of a social
one. At most, homosexuals comprise less than 10 percent of the
American population. Of these ten percent, probably less than
1 percent wants to get married. But the gay movement, in cahoots
with the reactionary CFR conspirators, has been using gay marriage
as a political tool in a scare PSYOP to influence presidential
elections and politics in the U.S
Initially, the main interventionist tool the CFR conspirators
had to control the policies of other countries was the U.S. Marines.
Later, they resorted to more subtle tools, like the Peace Corps.
It seems that now the interventionist tool of choice is the gay
movement, which they plan to use as a fifth column to influence
the policies of foreign countries. This is why Secretary of State
Hillary Clinton, a senior CFR agent, just recently declared that
the U.S. would only provide aid to countries that support “gay
Despite their claims, the gay movement leaders do not care for
the rights of homosexuals in the U.S., much less abroad. Actually,
they are using homosexuals as pawns to advance their agenda and
the globalization plans of their CFR masters in a dirty political
Granted, any group in this country has the right to express its
political ideas and fight for its political goals. What is disingenuous
and dishonest, though, is hiding these political aims behind a
cover of a social one, and using terms like “homophobic”
to discredit their political opponents. If a particular pressure
group wants to play the political game, that’s okay, but
they must play by the rules or get out of the game.
The American gay movement paints itself as liberal, progressive
and socially conscious. Actually, however, it is a secret tool
of the Council on Foreign Relations, probably the most reactionary
organization in America, where oil magnates, Wall Street bankers
and CEOs of transnational corporations conspire to bring about
the communo-fascist society they euphemistically call the New
World Order. This explains why nowhere in the gay literature
one can find a condemnation of the tyranny the NWO conspirators
are pushing upon the American people and the peoples of the world
— including homosexuals. This also explains why you don’t
see any rainbow flags among Bilderberg meetings protesters.
The time has come to call the gay movement’s bluff, get
it out of the social closet where it doesn’t belong and
expose it for what it really is: a reactionary political movement.
And this should not be construed as an act of gayphobia, but
as the necessary unmasking of a bunch of political opportunists.
 Henry Makow, “Surprise! Gay President Supports Gay Marriage.”
HenryMakow.com, May 10, 212. See also, Olivef Knox, “Obama
hosts LGBT Pride reception, vows to be ‘advocate’,”
YahooNews, June 16, 2012. http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/obama-hosts-lgbt-pride-reception-vows-advocate-223732067.html
 Both Hitler and Castro have been accused of being homosexuals.
See, i.e., Lothar Machtan, Hitler's Secret: The Double Life
of a Dictator. See also, Eleonora Bruzal and Luis José
Uzcátegui, Los hombres que erotizó Fidel.
According to Machtan, Hitler himself never condemned homosexuality,
but he allowed the persecution of gays in order to disguise his
own true colors. This could be easily applied to Castro.
 See, Samuel Igra, Germany’s National Vice (London:
Quality Press, 1945). Also, Judith Reisman, “‘Homosexists’:
Fanatical Mysoginists”, WorldNetDaily.com, November
5, 2010, http://www.wnd.com/2010/11/224557/.
 Further proof that not all homosexuals support the gay agenda
is the existence of HOPE (Homosexuals Opposed to Pride Extremism),
a Canadian organization of homosexuals who don’t want to
be tools gay political extremists. See, “Homosexuals Opposed
to Pride Extremism,” http://pfox.org/Homosexuals_Opposed_to_Pride_Extremism.html.
 One of the reasons why gay movement leaders hate Camille Paglia
is because she is the only one who had the guts to mention the
obvious fact that the two macho thugs who killed the effeminate
homosexual Matthew Shepard were actually gays. See, Camille Paglia,
“The Dangers of the Gay Agenda,” Salon.com,
November 1998, http://www.salon.com/col/pagl/1998/10/28pagl.html.
Unfortunately, most likely caving to gay pressure, Salon.com
purged the article, as well as all articles and readers’
comments that referred to it, from its database.
 American gays joining Venceremos Brigade in Dennis Altman,
Homosexual Oppression and Liberation (New York: Avon,
1971), p. 218.
 Bertrand Russell, The Impact of Science in Society,
(London: George Allen & Unwin, 1952), p. 40.
 LASA Conference, May 23-29 2012, San Francisco. See, “March
for gay rights in Cuba,” BBC.co.uk, May 19, 2012,
 Even accepting the prevalent confusion among non-gay homosexuals
who have been brainwashed to believe that all of them are gays
who support the gay agenda — which they aren’t —
according to some estimates, the people who identify themselves
as gays or lesbians are between 1.7 to 3.5 percent of the U.S.
adult population. See, “Demographer: US has 4M adults who
identify as gay,” AP, April 7, 2011, http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gMalA70bwj-kM-a8yy13MTSESdoQ?docId=186e417a96794d5f8f54a71c5e051d7f,
also, Ari Bloomekatz, “9 million U.S. adults say they are
lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender, study finds,”
Los Angeles Times, April 12, 2011, latimes.com/news/local/la-me-gay-population-20110412,0,2620332.story.latimes.com.
 Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen, After the Ball: How
America Will Conquer Its Fear and Hatred of Gays in the 90’s
(New York: Plume, 1989).
 Ibid. p. XV.
 Ibid., pp. xxvi-xxvii. On the other hand, there is the possibility
that other forces, not fortune alone, played the important role
they needed to advance their gay agenda. According to some researchers,
AIDS was an artificially created virus to decimate Africa’s
population through bacteriological warfare.
 Ibid., p. xxviii.
 Ibid., p. 153.
 Ibid., p. 161.
 Ibid., p. 163.
 Ibid., pp. 153, 157.
 Ibid., pp. 170-171.
 Ibid., p. 171.
 Ibid., p. 167.
 For a history of the gay movement as a political movement,
see Barry D. Adam, The Rise of the Gay and Lesbian Movement
(Boston: Twayne, 1987), pp. 12-16.
 Personally I don’t think the government, much less
the federal government, should have any role whatsoever in deciding
which citizens have the right to marriage and which don’t.
On the other hand, once that you accept that marriage in not the
union of a man and a woman, you have opened the possibility of
a union between a woman and several men, or a union between several
men, several women, a monkey and a turtle — the possibilities
are limitless. By the way, nothing new under the sun: Roman emperor
Caligula married his horse.
 In the case of George W. Bush, personal sympathies may have
played a role in the gay marriage charade. Bush sexual preferences
have been the subject of many articles in the Internet. See, i.e.,
Sherman H. Skolnick, “The Overthrown of the American Republic,”
Part 47, February 2, 2004. According to Skolnick, “Since
puberty, Bush has been the homosexual lover of Victor Ashe, former
Mayor of Knoxville, Tennessee.” See also, Alan Stang, Not
Holier Than Thou: How Queer is Bush? (Houston: Patton House:
 See, Paul Joseph Watson, “Brzezinski Decries Global
Political Awakening During CFR Speech,” Prison Planet.com,
Wednesday, May 19, 2010, http://www.prisonplanet.com/brzezinski-decries-global-political-awakening-during-cfr-speech.html.
 See, Sharon Hughes, “The Evolving Gay Marriage debate,”
NewsWithViews.com, May 11, 2012, http://www.newswithviews.com/Hughes/sharon172.htm.
 Dennis Cauchon, “Obama Stirs Churches,” USA
Today, May 14, 2012, p. 3A. See also, Rachel Zoll, “Losing
Faith in Democrat’s Religious Outreah,” Associated
Press, June 4, 2012, http://news.yahoo.com/losing-faith-democrats-religious-outreach-115104074.html.
 Servando Gonzalez, “Why I hate Republicans (Including
Tea Partiers), Even More Than I Hate Democrats,” TheIntelHub,
May 12, 2012, http://theintelhub.com/2012/05/11/why-i-hate-republicans-including-tea-partiers-even-more-than-i-hate-democrats.
 For an analysis of the gay marriage PSYOP, see Servando Gonzalez,
Psychological Warfare and the New World Order: The Secret
War Against the American People (Hayward, California: Spooks
Books, 2010), pp. 241-243.
 See, “Hillary Clinton on Gay Rights Abroad: Secretary
of State Delivers Historic LGBT Speech in Geneva,” The
Huffington Post, December 6, 2012, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/12/06/hillary-clinton-gay-rights-speech-geneva_n_1132392.html.
See also, “U.S. to Use Foreign Aid to Promote Gay Rights,”
Religion Today, December 7, 2011, http://www.religiontoday.com/blog/us-to-use-foreign-aid-to-promote-gay-rights.html.
 The CFR-controlled Rockefeller Foundation financed “gay”
and homosexual sexologist Alfred Kinsey.
 The recent gay movement's boycott of Chick-fil-A is proof
enough that their goal is to eliminate all freedom of expression
in America except theirs. Moreover, as the LASA convention shows,
it seems that the CFR conspirators who manipulate the gay movement
not only want to control American politics, but Cuban politics
as well. In 2011, the U.S. State Department contributed with $300,000
to , “strengthen the inclusion of the lesbian, gay, bisexual,
and transgender (LGBT) community” on the island. See, Matthew
Cullinan Hoffman, “Under Obama admin pressure, Cuba considers
recognizing homosexual unions,” LifeSiteNews.com,
January 24, 2011, http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/under-obama-admin-pressure-cuba-considers-recognizing-homosexual-unions.
 I don’t fear homosexuals, much less I feel an irrational
fear of them (homophobia). But, given their record in Nazi Germany
and Castro’s Cuba, I do fear gays because they have proved
to be very dangerous. And I think that effeminate homosexuals
should fear them even more than I do.
Servando Gonzalez is a Cuban-born American writer, semiologist
and intelligence analyst. He has written books, essays and articles
on Latin American history, intelligence, espionage, and semiotics.
Servando is the author of Historia herética de la revolución
fidelista, The Secret Fidel Castro, The Nuclear Deception
and La madre de todas las conspiraciones, all available
He also hosted the documentaries Treason in America: The Council
on Foreign Relations and Partners in Treason: The CFR-CIA-Castro
Connection, produced by Xzault Media Group of San Leandro,
California, both available at the author's site at http://www.servandogonzalez.org.
His book, Psychological Warfare and the New World Order: The
Secret War Against the American People appeared in late 2010
and is available at Amazon.com.
Or download a
.pdf copy of the book you can read on your computer or i-Pad.
His book, OBAMANIA: The New Puppet and His Masters,
is available at Amazon.com.
Servando's new book (in Spanish) La CIA,
Fidel Castro, el Bogotazo y el Nuevo Orden Mundial, just
appeared, and is available at Amazon.com
and other bookstores online. He is already working on his next
book, The Council on Foreign Relations and the Betrayal of
the American People: A Chronology of Treason, which he plans
to have ready by the end of this year.