Obama: Transparency, Invisibility,
"This present window of opportunity, during
which a truly peaceful and interdependent world order might be
built, will not be open for too long - We are on the verge of
a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis
and the nations will accept the New World Order."
-- David Rockefeller, speaking at the
UN Business Council, Sept. 14, 1994.
One of the most reassuring promises made by candidate Obama
was his pledge for transparency in government. Contrary to the
previous administration, where secrecy and concealment from public
view was the norm, the Obama administration, he promised over
and over, was going to have no secrets hidden from the American
people. But, just in a very short time, his promises seem to
have fallen short of reality.
First, we have the legitimate concern of many Americans about
true place of birth and nationality of the new tenant in
the White House. Far from transparency, the persons who have
tried to take a look at the documents have found a stonewall
of concealment and invisibility over his records. Several
lawsuits have being filed against him demanding he shows
the proof of his eligibility for the U.S. Presidency as explicitly
required by the Constitution. According to the persons filing
the suits, Mr. Obama does not meet the "natural born citizen"
clause of the U.S. Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, which
reads, "No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen
of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution,
shall be eligible to the Office of President."
But, despite all efforts, Mr. Obama has not provided the documentary
evidence that would easily prove, once and for all, that he is
a citizen of the United States of America by birth. Instead,
he has hired three law firms and spent hundreds of thousands
of dollars to evade a judicial review and avoid showing his birth
Suspicions about a conspiracy to deceive the American public
have been fueled by the fact that, as early as April 10, 2008,
a senate bill (S. Res. 511) was introduced, allegedly to support
Sen. McCain's legal right to be President of the U.S -- he was
born in a U.S. military base in Panama. But, aside from the fact
that McCain's right has never been an issue and Mr. Obama's eligibility
problem had not surfaced at the time, the senate bill was introduced
by several senators, among them Mrs. Clinton and Mr. Obama himself.
Second, we have the issue of his true identity. Is Mr. Obama
who he claims to be, or is his true name Barry Soetoro? Documents
posted in the Internet, which Obama has never refuted, show a
facsimile of his enrollment records when he attended the
Catholic school St. Fransiskus Assisis, in Jakarta, Indonesia,
where he was registered as Barry Soetoro, and his religion as
Muslim. Again, Mr. Obama has ignored the accusations over this
Finally, we have the problem of his oath of office. As witnessed
by millions of Americans, Mr. Obama failed to repeat faithfully,
as required by law, the wording of the oath. After ignoring the
issue for a whole day, and faced with growing concerns over whether
the president had been sworn properly according to the law, he
decided to give it a second try. And here comes the strangest
Despite his promises of transparency, Mr. Obama allegedly
took the oath for a second time at the White House's Map Room,
at 7:35 p.m. And I said allegedly, because the ceremony not only
was not announced until it was completed, but also no sound or
filmed record of it exists. And there is no record because the
president and his staff, on purpose, left out the accredited
White House press and impartial witnesses out. (Jeff Zeleny,
"I Really Do Swear, Faithfully: Obama and Roberts Try Again,"
New York Times, Jan. 22, 209, p. 1)
The only official record made public is a still photo of the
ceremony that allegedly took place, taken by the White House's
official photographer. But it is obvious that a still photo cannot
be used in a court of law as factual evidence to prove the occurrence
of an event of which, for lack of appropriate impartial witnesses,
only a sound recording, or, even better, a film or video recording,
can fully certify.
So, while about two million people watched the first swearing-in,
which was invalid because it violated the rules clearly established
by the Constitution, the second one, who was supposed to be the
real thing, was hidden from the American people following direct
orders from the transparency man in the White House. Consequently,
we have to take as legal proof the word of a politician -- the
alleged president -- who, like all politicians, is a professional
liar, and the word of the other nine people present, all of them
employees of the alleged president and, therefore, whose word
cannot be taken for granted because of an obvious conflict of
Next day -- just one day after Obama pledged "a new era
of openness" in government --, White House press Secretary
Robert Gibbs took the heat from the reporters for excluding accredited
photographers, tv cameras and a radio reporter from Obama's second
try. Gibbs' unconvincing explanation was that a photo taken by
a government photographer "provide(d) the documentation
as exactly what happened." (Mimi Hall, "Spokesman encounters
some bumps in first briefing," USA TODAY, Jan. 23,
2009, p. 6A.)
So much for the promises of a change to transparency by the
But these are not the only obscure things about the candidate
that promised transparency and clarity to the American voters.
If one is to believe the sycophantic press, we now have in
the White House the first black president in the history of the
United States. But this claim is highly disingenuous. Aside from
the fact that Bill Clinton has claimed that honor for many years,
and most African-American leaders accepted it at face value,
Mr. Obama is not black.
Though his father was black, his mother was Caucasian. Therefore,
he is actually a mulatto. And I would bet that, at the bottom
of his heart, he is not too happy about being called black. In
most countries mulattos feel offended when somebody calls them
Actually, the U.S. is the only country in the world where
a person who carries a single black gene in his body is called
black. You don't need to be a genius to realize that this is
a racist concept created and used in a pejorative way by white
racists. Unfortunately, American blacks made it theirs.
Moreover, despite claims to the contrary, Mr. Obama is not
The qualification of African-American is applied to citizens
of the United States who have origins in the black peoples of
Africa. But not all American blacks feel comfortable with the
name, among other things because, as
black American scholar Nathan Huggins has pointed out, the
"identity" of black Africans is a fiction created by
European whites. Actually, most so called "Africans"
don't feel themselves as belonging to a particular geographic
area, mush less a continent, but to a particular tribe, like
Ashanti, Watusi, etc. That perhaps explains why the Black Panthers
rightly refused the denomination "African-American",
and preferred to call themselves blacks, as evidenced in their
assertion that "black is beautiful."
But the adjective "African-American" is more than
an ethnographic one: it has strong political connotations. As
many African-American militants have pointed out, it expresses
pride in their African origins and solidarity with others of
the African Diaspora, particularly the ones brought to America
By the way, I personally don't see the point of being proud
of being the descendants of slaves, and most blacks in Africa
don't see it either. A friend of mine who lived in Africa for
several years told me that "African-Americans" are
not welcomed there. The reason for this is because, contrary
to American blacks, blacks in Africa see themselves as the descendants
of free men.
Probably they have a point. Ultimately, slavery
is a state of mind. A slave is a person who values life more
than freedom. People who value life more than freedom are already
slaves. Patrick Henry summarized the fact brilliantly when he
said, "Give me liberty or give me death."
I believe that the gun-wielding, proud Black Panthers did
more to raise the consciousness and morale of American blacks
than all the black pacifist movements together. Antonio Maceo,
a Cuban general who died in battle fighting the oppressive Spaniards,
summarized this state of mind when he said: "You don't beg
for your freedoms, but conquer them with the sharp edge of your
machete." Maceo, a Cuban national hero, was a descendant
This unconscious love of slavery of many "African-American"
leaders perhaps explains their love for the white slave master
just 60 miles South of the U.S. border. Some day his role as
an agent provocateur infiltrating the Black Panthers and other
militant black groups and betraying them to his Wall Street masters
will be revealed, and his "African-American" friends
will be ashamed.
It is also significant that Jesse Jackson, one of the most
notable admirers of the Cuban slave master, played a key role
in introducing the term "African-American". It was
quickly adopted and popularized by the conspirators-controlled
Mr. Obama's ancestors in Kenya were not brought to America
as slaves. Actually, there is a remote possibility that some
of his ancestors may have been among the blacks in Africa who
enriched themselves by
making some of their own kin slaves and selling them to the
Portuguese and other Europeans. Most of these slaves were acquired
through intertribal wars or simple kidnappings.
So, even though we don't know what Mr. Obama's true name is,
or if he is an American citizen by birth or not, or if he actually
took the oath as specified by the Constitution to be sworn as
the 44th President of the United States of America, we know for
sure that he is neither black nor an "African-American".
So much for the color of Mr. Obama's skin.
But what about the content of his character?
There are many things about Mr. Obama that we don't know,
and he doesn't seem eager to let us know. But, despite all his
efforts to muddying the waters, we can infer the content of his
character by looking at his actions, which tell us much more
than his words.
One thing that has become evident in the few weeks he has
been living in the White House as the alleged president of the
United States, is that, contrary to wrong expectations of both
the religious right and the religious left, he is not a liberal,
much less a leftist. Candidate Obama, who promised change above
all, has already appointed for high-level positions of his administration
a large group of the same old, corrupt politicians, who have
plagued previous administrations of both factions of the Repucratic
party during the last fifty years.
So, one conclusion we can arrive at with a high degree of
certainty is that Mr. Obama is not on the side of the poor and
the worker, but of the rich and the leisure class.
But, what about the promised change?
Well, if there is any change at all, it will be because it
seems that he is on the way to appointing even more members of
the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) than previous administrations.
Given the large number of them in the previous three, we have
to recognize this as a real feat.
If you are one the many Americans who still get your daily
ration of (dis)information through the tv networks and the mainstream
press, and consequently doesn't know what the CFR is, I will
give you a short briefing to put you up to speed. The Council
on Foreign Relations, with headquarters at the Harold Pratt House
in Manhattan, is perhaps the most anti-American organization
in the world. It agglutinates a small group of corrupt and treacherous
Wall Street bankers and lawyers, oil magnates, and CEOs of transnational
corporations, surrounded by a larger group of ass kissers and
opportunists of all walks of life, who secretly and actively
conspire to destroy America and eventually control the world.
This corrupt organization has been behind every single act
of treason to this country and its people -- ranging from collaborating
with the Nazis to betraying the American military. As CFR's mouthpiece
Henry Kissinger put it, "Military men are just dumb stupid
animals to be used as pawns in foreign policy."
The CFR conspirators have managed to infiltrate and control
the three branches of the U.S. government as well as most of
the mainstream press. Currently, they are in the process of carrying
out the final act of high treason: the destruction of this country
as we know it, and its fusion with Canada and Mexico into the
North American Union as a first step into the American Union
-- from Alaska to the Patagonia -- under their control through
the coming comuno-fascist society they euphemistically call the
"New World Order."
Unfortunately, Mr. Obama is fully under the control of this
treacherous organization. This explains why his actions since
he grabbed power a few weeks ago -- which are much more revealing
than his words -- have only benefited his Wall Street and Big
Oil masters. But his treachery is not new. It began some time
During his campaign, Mr. Obama's advisors included Anthony
Lake, Susan Rice, William Daley and Daniel Tarullo, all
of them CFR members. Other CFR members already recruited
by Obama for his administration of "change" are Anthony
Lake, Richard Clarke, Ivo Daalder, Dennis Ross, Lawrence Korb,
Stephen Flynn, Timothy Geithner, Lawrence Summers, and the infamous
Even more alarming, Obama's key advisor, manipulating him
behind the curtains since the early days of his campaign, and
invisible to the American's eyes, is none other than senior CFR
member Zbigniew Brzezinski, a neocon "liberal" villain
only surpassed in malevolence by CFR member and war criminal,
"conservative" Henry Kissinger.
Finally, for those gullible fools who voted for Obama hoping
that he was going to oust Bush, Cheney and the nefarious neocons,
and cancel their criminal policies, I have an unpleasant surprise.
In his book, The Great Chessboard, published in 1979,
Mr. Brzezinski explains his views on international policy, which
happen to be even more cynical than the neocon's PNAC
America's Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New
Century" -- a blueprint of the conspirators' plans for
uncontested world hegemony using the U.S. armed forces (paid
by us, the American taxpayers) as their own panzer units on a
global blitzkrieg to forcefully impose their New World Order
upon the peoples of the world. No wonder some people have compared
it to Hitler's Mein Kampf. Most of the neo-cons, including
their friends Dick Cheney and Condi Rice, are members of the
Council on Foreign Relations.
But warmongering Bzrezinski makes them look like doves in
comparison. Bzrezinski's geostrategic advise to his imperial
CFR masters is stark and clear:
"The last decade of the twentieth century has witnessed
a tectonic shift in world affairs. For the first time ever, a
non-Eurasian power has emerged not only as a key arbiter of Eurasian
power relations but also as the world's paramount power. The
defeat and collapse of the Soviet Union was the final step in
the rapid ascendance of a Western Hemisphere power, the United
States, as the sole and, indeed, the first truly global power..."
"Two basic steps are thus required: first, to identify
the geostrategically dynamic Eurasian states that have the power
to cause a potentially important shift in the international distribution
of power and to decipher the central external goals of their
respective political elites and the likely consequences of their
seeking to attain them;... second, to formulate specific U.S.
policies to offset, co-opt, and/or control the above..."
"...To put it in a terminology that harkens back to the
more brutal age of ancient empires, the three grand imperatives
of imperial geostrategy are to prevent collusion and maintain
security dependence among the vassals, to keep tributaries pliant
and protected, and to keep the barbarians from coming together."
"Henceforth, the United States may have to determine
how to cope with regional coalitions that seek to push America
out of Eurasia, thereby threatening America's status as a global
power." (p. 55)
"America is now the only global superpower, and Eurasia
is the globe's central arena. Hence, what happens to the distribution
of power on the Eurasian continent will be of decisive importance
to America's global primacy and to America's historical legacy."
"That puts a premium on maneuver and manipulation in
order to prevent the emergence of a hostile coalition that could
eventually seek to challenge America's primacy..." (p. 198)
"The most immediate task is to make certain that no state
or combination of states gains the capacity to expel the United
States from Eurasia or even to diminish significantly its decisive
arbitration role." (p. 198)
"For Pakistan, the primary interest is to gain Geostrategic
depth through political influence in Afghanistan - and to deny
to Iran the exercise of such influence in Afghanistan and Tajikistan
- and to benefit eventually from any pipeline construction linking
Central Asia with the Arabian Sea." (p. 139)
What Brzezinski does not mention, though, is that all these
efforts are actually directed at avoiding that the countries
in the mentioned area exploit their natural resources, mainly
natural gas and oil, which, by right, belong to the CFR globalists
and their partners in crime.
And, exactly as his neocon friends, who in their September
2000 warmongering manifesto "Rebuilding America's Defenses"
expressed their hope in the occurrence of a Pearl Harbor-like
event to catalyze public opinion in favor of their plans, Bzrezinski
expresses his views that:
"Moreover, as America becomes an increasingly multi-cultural
society, it may find it more difficult to fashion a consensus
on foreign policy issues, except in the circumstance of a truly
massive and widely perceived direct external threat." (p.
"The attitude of the American public toward the external
projection of American power has been much more ambivalent. The
public supported America's engagement in World War II largely
because of the shock effect of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor.
Luckily for Bzrezinski and the neocons, thanks to an extraordinary
and fortunate coincidence (coincidence in not a scientific
concept) the 9/11 events materialized the Pearl Harbor-like incident
they had been craving for.
Caution: keep in mind that when Brzezinski mentions "America's
geostrategic interests" he actually means "the interests
of the CFR conspirators who have infiltrated and taken control
of the American government", that is, the Wall Street bankers
and oil magnates. They are the ones who have been using the State
Department, the CIA, and the U.S. military to advance their own
mean interests, not the interests of the American taxpayers.
I don't think that my next-door neighbor, nor most Americans,
for that matter, have any geostrategic interests whatsoever beyond
But the love between the neocons and Obama is mutual.
Some observers of the political scene have noticed that Bush's
neocons are delighted with the new man in the White House. A
recent article by Stephen J. Sniegoski, published in the English
language edition of the Swiss newspaper Zeit-Fragen, reported
that leading figures of the neocon/neonazi cabal -- David Brooks,
Richard Perle, Max Boot, Mona Charen and others -- are ecstatic
over Obama's appointments. According to Sniegoski, the reason
for their happiness is because they don't see any difference
between the Obama and the Bush administrations.
But Mr. Sniegoski's conclusions are wrong. Actually, the true
reason for this is because Obama and Bush, as well as Brzezinski
and the neocons, are puppets manipulated by the very same CFR
Joining the neocon dissonant chorus, pseudo-conservative professional
disinformer Rush Limbaugh highly praised the appointment of Hillary
Clinton as secretary of state, and qualified Obama's decision
as "brilliant." As a way of payment, Obama publicly
criticized Limbaugh, in a subtle effort to strengthen his damaged
bona fides vis-à-vis a growing number of his disenchanted
listeners, who have growing suspicions that the radio host is
not what he claims to be.
In the same fashion, faux-conservative David Horowitz actually
scolded concerned conservative activists filing lawsuits regarding
Obama's citizenship status. Apparently not because he didn't
believe the claims about Obama's illegitimacy, but rather because
he has shown his true hawkish nature -- a fact he believes conservatives
Currently the U.S. is in the middle of a growing economic
crisis that may be recorded in history as the Greatest Depression.
Most Americans are extremely concerned about the outcome of this
crisis, which is rapidly expanding to the whole world, and a
large number of them are already experiencing its effects.
The main cause of this crisis is that globalization and free
trade opened the way for international corporations to cut, under
the guise of globalization and free trade, high paid jobs in
the U.S. and send them abroad transmogrified into low paid jobs
(many Mexican workers in the maquiladoras are paid five dollars
. . . a day!). As expected, this has not benefited Americans
workers. The ones who have profited enormously are the CEOs and
stockholders of these corporations.
Faced with lower incomes, American workers resorted to buy
heavily on credit -- initially from their homes' equity, and
later from credit cards. As a last resort, most Americans resorted
to buy most of their goods at stores like COSCO, Wall Mart, K
Mart, and the like. Apparently it never crossed their minds that
every time they were buying a product "Made in China"
to save a few bucks, they were hammering another nail in America's
Eventually the credit bubble could not expand any more and
imploded. Currently, like in a third world country, American
workers cannot afford to buy the products they make, or used
to make, because they don't earn enough money to buy them. But
Mr. Obama's economic measures, allegedly taken to stop the crisis,
have been rightly compared to extinguishing a fire by spraying
gasoline to it.
A sure way to begin stopping this crisis would be to cancel
all globalization and "free trade" agreements like
CAFTA, NAFTA, etc., and bring the jobs back to America. But this
is something that Mr. Obama's CFR masters will never allow him
to do. On the contrary, a compromise in the Senate had been negotiated
on the simple base that the so-called stimulus plan include a
"Buy American" provision. As expected, Mr. Obama refused.
Quietly, the "Buy American" provision was watered down
until it practically disappeared.
Exactly the same way as Mr. Bush who, with the support of
the religious right and the "conservative" press, betrayed
true American conservatives, Mr. Obama, with the support of the
religious left and the "liberal" press, already has
begun his betrayal of true American liberals. But, despite minor
differences, both of them, Obama and Bush, are basically the
same thing: useful tools in the hands of the NWO conspirators
whose ultimate goal is the destruction of America and its people.
And, make no mistake, this is the last battle and it is a battle
So, if doing the same thing expecting different results is
a clear symptom of insanity, one may surmise that the man in
the White House is a good candidate for commitment to a mental
institution. But I don't think Mr. Obama is crazy. If his policies
are so similar to the ones implemented by Mr. Bush, it is just
because Mr. Obama is getting his marching orders from the same
place as Mr. Bush: the Harold Pratt House in Manhattan.
Most people all around the world are extremely concerned about
the present economic crisis, but not everybody see it as a bad
thing. Actually some globalist conspirators are very happy about
it. CFR secret agent Henry Kissinger, former British Prime Minister
Tony Blair, founder of World Economic Forum Klaus Schwab, French
President Nicolas Zarkozy, German Chancellor Angela Merkel, and
other major globalists, see this crisis as a God sent (their
God is probably John D. Rockefeller) opportunity to give the
final push to the comuno-fascist New World Order.
Though the mainstream press has pushed its version that the
present crisis is just the product of greed, foolishness and
stupidity, the truth is that it is the result of a carefully
conceived plan, put into practice by the globalist conspirators,
to justify the creation of a New World Order they envision. But
the conspirators, despite all their power and money, are not
all-powerful gods and cannot control all the variables of this
global game. So, I suggest that We the People give them a taste
of their own medicine: let's seize the opportunity this crisis
brings us, to defeat the New World Order.
Servando Gonzalez is a Cuban-born American writer. He received
his training as a historian at the University of Havana, and
has written books, essays, articles, and multimedia on Cuban
and Latin American history, intelligence and espionage, semiotics
and political satire.
Servando is the author of Historia herética de la
revolución fidelista; Fidel Castro para herejes
y otros invertebrados, Observando, The Secret Fidel
Castro: Deconstructing the Symbol, The Nuclear Deception:
Nikita Khrushchev and the Cuban Missile Crisis, and La
madre de todas las conspiraciones: una novela de ideas subversivas.
He is currently working on his second novel, Juegos mentales:
una novella de guerra psicológica, which deals with
the Bogotazo riots and the true origins of the CIA.
His articles have been published in many magazines, newspapers,
and Web sites in the U.S. and abroad. As a multimedia developer,
Servando authored many computer programs, among them: Hypertext
for Beginners, Popol Vuh: An Interactive Text/Graphics
Adventure, The Riddle of the Swastika: A Study in Symbolism,
and How to Create Your Own Personal Intelligence Agency.
His documentary film, Treason
in America: The Council on Foreign Relations, the first
program of the TruhLies series, appeared in mid 2008. The next
program, Partners in Treason: The CFR-CIA-Castro Connection
will appear in early 2009.
Servando's web site is at http://www.servandogonzalez.org