Politically Incorrect View of Political Correctness
By Servando Gonzalez
January 24, 2016
Of late, some people are reacting against the
mental tyranny of politically correctness. It seems, however,
that not even its strongest critics have a real idea of what political
correctness really is. Apparently, even they have been brainwashed
to the point that they have a politically correct definition of
Nevertheless, as Sun Tzu said, only the man who knows his enemy
like himself will win all the battles. So, let’s take a
close, critical look at the term.
According to most dictionaries, the term political correctness
“Conforming to a belief that language
and practices which could offend political sensibilities (as
in matters of sex or race) should be eliminated,” “agreeing
with the idea that people should be careful to not use language
or behave in a way that could offend a particular group of people.”
— Merriam Webster Dictionary.
“Demonstrating progressive ideals, especially by avoiding
vocabulary that is considered offensive, discriminatory, or
judgmental, especially concerning race and gender. Abbreviation:
PC.” — Collins Dictionary.
“Conforming to a particular sociopolitical ideology or
point of view, especially to a liberal point of view concerned
with promoting tolerance and avoiding offense in matters of
race, class, gender, and sexual orientation.” —
American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, Fifth
“Politically correct language or behavior not offensive,
especially to people who have often been affected by discrimination.”
— Macmillan Dictionary.
“Political correctness (or PC for short) means using words
or behavior which will not offend any group of people. Most
people think it is important for everyone to be treated equally,
fairly and with dignity.” — Wikipedia.
Unfortunately, all of the above definitions
of political correctness are politically correct. For a change,
though, let’s take a look at my politically incorrect definition
of political correctness — which differs considerably from
the definitions currently appearing in most dictionaries.
To me, political correctness simply means not telling the truth
about things damaging to a political cause some people support.
Proof of this is that the person who disagrees with your view
never tells you “Don’t say that, because it is not
true,” but “Don’t say that because it is not
politically correct.” Therefore, political correctness is
not a linguistic, sociological or cultural term, much less a scientific
statement, but a political one.
Let me show you some examples that prove my point:
Some people believe that saving the planet from the destruction
caused by humans is a good, noble cause. Therefore, if I tell
them that global warming is nothing but unscientific hogwash created
to scare us to the point of voluntarily stopping driving cars
and eating red meat, their immediate reaction will be to tell
me that I am not politically correct.
Some people are convinced that implementing a New Gay World Order
is a good cause because it will bring democracy, peace, prosperity
and equality upon the whole planet. Therefore, to them, anybody
opposing the NGWO is not politically correct.
Others think that armed citizens who don’t share their beliefs
are a threat to the implementation of the NGWO. Therefore, if
you say that cars, medical doctors and prescription drugs kill
more people than guns, to them this is not politically correct.
It is interesting to see, though, that in these times when university
students complain about “microagressions,” nobody
seems to have noticed that the term “political correctness”
is the overt manifestation of a macroaggression. When somebody
tells you not to use a particular term, because it is “politically
incorrect,” what he/she is actually doing is warning you
that if you keep using it you will run into trouble — most
likely you will be accused of being a racist, homophobe, white
supremacist, etc. after which you will be ostracized and even
lose your job.
Now, what makes me a specialist in political correctness to the
point that I dare to question the definitions provided by such
prestigious dictionaries? Well, the fact that I lived for twenty
years in Castro’s Cuba, the country where the term was initially
tested. The only difference was that in Cuba, when you said
some truths damaging to the “revolution”, they
didn’t warn you by saying “this is not politically
correct,” but “Don’t say that because this is
So, it is safe to conclude that political correctness is an invention
concocted by the evil progressive, liberal, Democratic Left and
the commies. Right?
Political correctness is not an exclusive aberrant phenomenon
of the Left. There are non-written rules of political correctness
among “conservative” Republicans.
For example, if you are a “conservative” Republican
you should never mention World Trade Center Building 7 —
the 47-story skyscraper that collapsed on its own footprint despite
the fact that no plane crashed against it. Why? Because George
W. Bush is a true conservative American patriot and a religious
man— or so they believe — and anything that questions
his narrative of the 9/11 events is not politically correct.
Moreover, you should never ask why, despite the fact 9/11 was
(allegedly) the worst failure of the US intelligence and the military
in their job to protect us, nobody was fired for their gross incompetence.
This explains why when Trump violated the rules of political correctness
and mentioned that 9/11 happened during George W. Bush’s
watch Jeb Bush almost had a fit.
Also, “conservative” Republicans should never mention
that George W. Bush’s Patriot Act is the worst attack on
the US Constitution in recent times and that the War on Terror
he declared is a hoax. Telling the truth is very unpolitically
Even more important, is you are a true “conservative”
Republican you should never mention that it was your beloved George
H.W. Bush who stated in every speech about the need to create
a New World Order. In addition, you should never mention that
this NWO Bush loved so much meant the abolishment of the US Constitution
and the end of US sovereignty under a global government controlled
by the CFR conspirators. In addition, you are not supposed to
remember the Bush family’s past ties to the Nazis nor their
present ties to the bin Laden family and the Saudis.
So much for the anti-political correctness of the hypocritical
But there is also a particular type of insidious political correctness
that affects both the “liberal” Democratic Left and
the “conservative” Republican Right.
For example, you should never mention that the two-party system
is a hoax, much less that there is an Invisible Government of
the United States. Even more important, you should never mention
that the Council on Foreign Relations, the visible head of this
Invisible Government you should never tell about, is the most
anti-American organization in the U.S.
Even more important, you should never mention that our current
military’s main job is not to defend and protect the Constitution,
our borders and our culture, but to protect the interests of a
few transnational corporations abroad.
Currently, it has become evident that, without exception, not
only most politicians, but also all mainstream media, either of
the Left or Right persuasion, are politically correct. There are
subjects they would never mention and, if they mention any of
them, it is only to vilify the people who have dared to mention
them. Politicians and mainstream media stars will never dare
to bite the hand that feeds them.
So, what can you do to fight the scourge of political correctness?
Admit that you are powerless and stick your head in the sand?
You can do something very simple: Don’t play by their rules.
Fight political correctness by not being politically correct.
This is exactly what Donald Trump has been doing, and nobody can
deny that he has been very successful. Apparently he sensed that
the American people are sick and tired of political correctness.
Of course, I understand that not being politically correct entails
some grave risks —the PC crowd can destroy you socially,
economically, and even can kill you. Fear is the mechanism the
CFR globalist conspirators are using to implement their New Gay
World Order, and political correctness is one of their most efficient
tools. But there is a point when you have to draw a line in the
sand and yell:
mad as hell and I’m not going to take this anymore!
1. See, Bill White, “Time to Push Back at
Political Correctness,” Survivopedia, January 5,
2. For a close look at my theory that Castro’s Cuba is a
successful test of the New Gay World Order, see my book Psychological
Warfare and the New World Order: The Secret War Against the American
3. There was never a revolution in Cuba. What we had was a rebellion
to depose a corrupt dictator and change the country back to normality.
Unfortunately, Castro managed to get full control of it and changed
the rebellion into his sui generis “revolution.” See
my book The Secret Fidel Castro: Deconstructing the Symbol.
4. Actually, there was an exception: Orlando airport Immigration
agent Jose Melendez, who on August 4, 2001 stopped the 20th terrorist,
a Saudi man named Mohamed al-Kahtani. As a show of appreciation
for a job well done, the U.S. government harassed Melendez and
finally he was fired.
5. I have the feeling that Hillary Clinton will not get prosecuted
for her role in the Benghazi events. Why? Because investigating
the Benghazi events may open the door to investigate Bush and
Cheney for their role in the 9/11 events, something “conservative”
Republicans don’t want.
6. The politically correct crowd survives thanks to generous funding
from the most reactionary organizations — most of them under
the direct control of the CFR. See, i.e., Evan Gahr, “Paymasters
of the PC Brigades,” The Wall Street Journal, January
Also, Lachlan Markay, “The ‘Billionaire’s Club’
Behind the Green Movement,” The Free Beacon, July
30, 2014, http://freebeacon.com/issues/the-billionaires-club-behind-the-green-movement/.
Also, Daniel Brandt, “Philanthropists at War,” NameBase
NewsLine, No. 15, October-December 1996, www.namebase.org/news15.html
Servando Gonzalez, is a Cuban-born American writer,
historian, semiologist and intelligence analyst. He has written
books, essays and articles on Latin American history, intelligence,
espionage, and semiotics. Servando is the author of Historia
herética de la revolución fidelista, Observando,
Secret Fidel Castro: Deconstructing the Symbol, The
Nuclear Deception: Nikita Khrushchev and the Cuban Missile Crisis
madre de todas las conspiraciones: Una novela de ideas subversivas,
all available at Amazon.com.
He also hosted the documentaries Treason in America: The Council
on Foreign Relations and Partners in Treason: The CFR-CIA-Castro
Connection, produced by Xzault Media Group of San Leandro,
California, both available at the author's site at http://www.servandogonzalez.org.
His book, Psychological Warfare and the New
World Order: The Secret War Against the American People is
available at Amazon.com.
Or download a
.pdf copy of the book you can read on your computer, iPad,
Nook, Kindle or any other tablet. His book, OBAMANIA:
The New Puppet and His Masters, is available at Amazon.com.
Servando's book (in Spanish) La CIA, Fidel Castro, el Bogotazo
y el Nuevo Orden Mundial, appeared last year, and is available
and other bookstores online.
His most recent book, I
Dare Call It treason: The Council on Foreign Relations and the
Betrayal of the America is available
at Amazon.com and other bookstores online.