Falsification of Science
By Servando Gonzalez
Copyright © 2011. All
to Barry Glassner, president of Lewis & Clark College in Portland,
Oregon, there are high levels of disconnection between scientists
and the public on issues such as vaccination safety, organic food,
evolution, and global warming. His solution to the problem: scientists
need to become more skilled in communicating their beliefs, by
means that address emotions, fears and values.
What Glassner fails to mention, however, is that all the ‘scientific’
findings he mentions, which a growing majority of the people are
not buying, imply the imposition of government controls detrimental
to their standard of living, their freedom and even their right
to life, property and the pursuit of happiness. Moreover, as he
himself admitted, most of these “scientific” findings
are not the result of conclusions based on verifiable data, but
But there is more than meets the eye in these scientists’
Let’s suppose, just for the sake of the argument, that half
of the American people were absolutely convinced that the Earth
was flat and the moon made of Swiss cheese. Had the official scientific
community been so alarmed before such ignorance? Of course not,
because abandoning such beliefs would only meant a better understanding
of the material world, not a whole societal change.
But, having a majority of the people not believing in such thing
as man-caused global warming implies that it would be very difficult
for them to accept higher taxes and diminishing standards of living
based on bogus climatological science — which brings us
to the very conundrum of the problem Glassner conveniently ignores.
And the problem has more to do with politics, depopulation, deindustrialization,
and even the black arts and the occult, than with science. No
wonder the scientific community is losing its credibility at an
True science (when I use the word “science” in this
article I am actually referring to Western science) means directing
the intelligence to something with the only purpose of discovering
the absolute truth underlying the complex problems of the universe
for the pure enjoyment of it, without expecting any material gain.
This love of truth is the guiding principle that should direct
true scientific research. To do this, true scientists must follow
to the letter the principles of the scientific method.
The scientific method is a set of techniques for the collection
of data and the formulation and testing of hypotheses used for
the systematic pursuit of knowledge. The principles of the scientific
method, accepted by the world’s scientific community, involve
a series of relatively simple steps:
Step 1: Ask questions in the form of a hypothesis.
Step 2: Look for patterns in observations.
Step 3: Formulate a theory that can be independently verifiable.
Step 4: Design experiments to test the theory.
Finally, and this is the most important of the
principles in which science is based, the hypothesis must be falsifiable,
that is, it can be proved false. For a hypothesis to be falsifiable,
it must be possible to make an observation or do a physical experiment
that would prove the hypothesis to be false. For a true scientist,
that which is falsifiable, but has not yet been shown to be false,
is accepted as scientific; that which is not falsifiable is not
accepted as scientific.
That was exactly what Karl Popper, one of the greatest philosopher
of science, had in mind when he wrote that, for something to be
called scientific, it must be, as he put it, "falsifiable."
That is, for something to be scientifically true, you must be
able to test it to verify if it is false. That is what scientific
experimentation and observation is about. That is the very essence
of the scientific method.
We cannot prove the existence of an all-powerful God who created
the universe, neither can we prove that he didn’t. Consequently,
any claims of his existence or non-existence falls outside the
field of science. But this does not means he cannot exist, just
that it cannot be proved false using the scientific method. Actually,
the fact that some theory cannot be proved false only indicates
that it escapes the domain of what we call science.
Claiming that the existence of heaven and an afterlife is an unscientific
“fairy story,” as Britsh physicist Stephen Hawkings
recently did, is equivalent to the Pope saying that global
warming is a scientific fact. Coming from these two sources, make
these assertions totally irrelevant, because both of them are
speaking pout of their field of expertise. Science and religion
(and music, poetry, literature, for that matther) are different
domains of human endeavor, important but totally independent.
The fact that Western science cannot study what we call “intuition,”
because the scientific method cannot be applied to its study,
does not mean that intuition does not exist.
In the same fashion, the obvious fact that we cannot apply the
scientific method to economics, psychology, political science,
social sciences, and the rest of the so-called “soft sciences,”
actually mean that they are not sciences at all. No wonder they
have been systematically used by the New World Order conspirators
to advance their secret agendas.
Actually, the real problem is not that the social sciences have
been permeated by liberal biases, but that social sciences are
not sciences at all but religious ideas disguised as facts. If
social sciences were true science, the fact that a scientist is
a liberal or a conservative would be irrelevant, because true
science is based on the scientific method, which is basically
based on provable facts, and facts don’t have ideologies.
But the verb “falsify” has another meaning. It also
accounts for forge, fake, counterfeit, fabricate, alter, change,
doctor, tamper with, fudge, manipulate, adulterate, corrupt, misrepresent,
misreport, distort, warp, embellish, embroider and, in an informal
way, to cook. Unfortunately, these seem to be the meanings most
modern scientist have recently subscribed to. Of lately, many
of them have been cooking the facts.
Among the most notorious frauds committed by scientist are the
Piltdown mandible fraud, used by SJ Teilhard de Chardin in an
effort to prove the Darwinian evolution, and the cooking of data
by scientists at the East Anglia university, in an effort to prove
that anthropogenic global warming is a scientific fact. Though
nowadays the falsification of science is pervasive, the most evident
case is the “global warming” theory, but we can also
mention, Darwinism and evolution. Not surprisingly, all these
theories provide a bogus scientific base to the secret depopulation
and deindustrialization agendas of the globalist conspirators.
Being based on a materialistic philosophy, the scientific method
is not perfect, but its principles are the rules of this game
we call science. Either you play the game by the rules, or you
cheat, and this is precisely what most scientists have been doing
lately. Slowly, but sure, Western science has prostituted itself
into corporate science, an activity practiced by people who, while
still call themselves scientists, their true goal is not finding
the truth, but a “truth” that benefits their corporate
The Council on Foreign Relations conspirators who are pushing
their secret NWO agenda of depopulation and deindustrialization
have also successfully infiltrated most American colleges and
universities. The main tool for control used by the CFR is money,
which they liberally distribute through the myriad of non-profit
foundations they control. Cardinal among them are the Carnegie,
Ford, MacArthur, Mellon, and Rockefeller Foundations, and a constellation
of minor foundations who get most of their funds from the ones
already mentioned. These minor foundations are used as cut-outs
to hide the true sources of money.
Just a perfunctory study of the way the “philanthropic”
foundations controlled by the Rockefellers and their friends channel
their funds, show that most of their efforts is devoted to finance
organizations whose main goal, overt or covert, is population
control through eugenics. We must also keep in mind their ability
to instigate wars and revolutions by playing both sides of conflicts,
and to artificially create plagues and famine, the most effective
way to control population growth.
Nevertheless, even after the conspirators have devoted much money
and effort for more than a century to curb population, particularly
by killing the poor, they reached the conclusion that population
growth was uncontrollable unless they were to take more drastic
measures to stop it. So, after conducting long and rigorous “scientific”
studies, they concluded that, in order to guarantee their survival
at the levels of luxury and superabundance they are used to, they
had to eliminate no less than 85 percent of the planet’s
population and reduce the survivors to pre-industrial levels of
consumption. And the only way to accomplish it was by the implementation
of a worldwide communo-fascist form of government they call the
New World Order.
And most “scientists” have willingly joined their
camp to help them reach their goals as quick and efficiently as
possible. We are now facing a new generation of people who call
themselves scientists, but cannot accept that their theories may
be false — particularly when their research is based on
profitable grants provided by corporate capital. Moreover, some
of them resort to all sort of unethical tricks, including the
alteration of outright falsification of data, to prove their points.
Am I implying that all the scientist who have received grants
from these foundations to do research are told what they should
write? Of course not. But, like mice in a psychologist’s
maze, scholars soon discover that some research conclusions guarantee
a constant input of grant money, while others dry it.
To these “scientists,” there is no scientific fact
more convincing to prove their theories than a number followed
by many zeroes written on a check -- the more zeroes, the more
convincing. No wonder a great majority of the people have lost
respect for the type of “science” their want to pass
as fact in order to provide our puppet government the justification
for the implementation of social engineering laws that restrict
As somebody rightly put it,
The very reputation of so-called "science"
has been irreparably damaged by the invocation of the term "science"
by GMO lackeys, pesticide pushers, mercury advocates and fluoride
poisoners who all claim to have science on their side. It seems
that every toxin, contamination and chemical disaster that now
infects our planet has been evangelized in the name of ‘science.
Contrary to what most scientists believe, things
outside the domain of science, like art, literature, music, or
religion, are as important, or even more important and useful
to mankind, than science itself. Scientists, however, have adopted
an arrogant position as self-appointed judges of value, even on
things that are fully outside the domain of science. Their mistake
is multiplied by the fact that value is totally subjective, therefore,
outside the domain of science.
Stating, for example, that the idea of creation has no scientific
value is as foolish as saying that the theory of quantum physics
has no religious, poetic, or artistic value. The appropriate answer
to that kind of reasoning is, “So what?” The two things
pertain to different domains of the human knowledge. But, while
most people would never accept a religious evaluation of scientific
facts, they accept without objections scientific evaluations of
religious beliefs. Religion and science occupying different domains,
a principle that Stephen Jay Gould has designated as NOMA (which
stands for “nonoverlapping magisteria”). However,
most people, particularly scientists, seem to ignore that basic
For example, on October 23, 1996, while speaking to the Pontifical
Academy of Sciences plenary session at the Vatican, Pope John
Paul II declared the evolutionary theories of Charles Darwin to
be fact. According to him, Catholics must now accept evolution
not as a plausible possibility but also as a proven fact. However,
If we accept the NOMA principle, we most conclude that the Pope’s
words about evolution are as irrelevant as any scientist’s
words about religion. On the other hand, the fact that the Pope,
a main religious figure, has finally accepted evolution as a fact,
is the final proof of what many people have suspected all along:
that the theory of evolution is not a scientific fact, but a religious
belief — in which case the Pope has all the authority to
express his opinion about it.
The unquestionable fact is that the claims of the validity and
scope of the findings of what we call science have been highly
exaggerated. Philosopher George Santayana put the matter of the
validity of science to rest when he said that “Science is
neither a method nor a body of knowledge. It is a body of changing
opinion aspiring to be true.” One of the most revealing
paradoxes of science is that the so called “scientific method”
is not itself subject to scientific proof. It is an assumption
and an article of faith that scientists adopt to believe, or to
make non-scientists believe, that doing scientific work is worthwhile.
Even more important, allowing scientists to decide by themselves
what is science and what it is not, is a very unscientific approach,
to say the least. Contrary to what our children are told, science
is not, and has never being, the idealized portrait painted in
textbooks and spoon-fed to students in our public schools. It
has always being skewed by social and political values —
that is, beliefs. The intense biases of scientists contrast strongly
with the storybook image of the cold, detached scientist widely
divulged by historians and sociologists of science — which
makes them even more dangerous.
Currently, the discredit of the world’s scientific community,
including organizations like the United Nations’ Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change, is so widespread that just the fact that
any official scientific organization backs a new “scientific”
theory should be motive enough to suspect its true scientific
value. But it doesn’t matter. Despite a widespread global
skepticism about the scientific value of the global warming theory,
the globalist conspirators keep pushing their agenda and using
it as a justification for global control.
Granted, no sane person in this planet can deny that we need to
curb pollution and take care of the environment. What should make
us suspicious, however, is that the same organizations directly
responsible for creating the present levels of pollution, that
is, big oil and transnational corporations, are the ones secretly
bankrolling the environmental movement. If one discards the possibility
that the big corporations may be financing their enemies, the
logical conclusion is that, the environmentalists are helping
the corporations they claim to hate. Actually, just the most perfunctory
analysis shows that environmental legislation hurts small businesses
much more than it does big corporations.
Moreover, most of the environmental laws proposed give multi-national
corporations more competitive advantage and so helps them to get
bigger and bigger. Since just by being bigger corporations have
the greatest capacity for environmental damage, environmentalists,
wittingly or unwittingly, are contributing to the deterioration
of the environment.
Further proof that the environmentally correct, progressive scientists
are just a tool of the reactionary conspirators is that some harmful
forms of environmental pollution are barely mentioned in their
studies. The most important ones among these sources of pollution
are noise, as well as electric and electromagnetic radiation (e.g.,
high-voltage lines and cell phone transmission towers).
Much less they mention chemtrails (scientifically called “stratospheric
aerosol geoengineering”), unless to ridicule the people
who show proof of its existence. The reason for this selective
blindness is because stopping these types of pollution does not
bring any benefit to the energy monopolies, nor they help the
globalist conspirators’ plans for the creation of a New
 Barry Glasser, “How to Help Scientists and the Public
See Eye-to-eye,” USA Today, March 14, 2011, p.9A.
 See, Ian Sample, “Stephen Hawking: 'There is no heaven;
it's a fairy story',” Guardian.co.uk, May 15, 2011,
 The so-called “Climategate,” scandal began in
November 2009 when a hacker published in the Internet thousands
of emails and other documents from the University of East Anglia’s
Climatic Research Unit. By the way, what the hacker brought to
light was not new, just that had been ignored by the mainstream
media. See. i.e., Henry Lamb, “The Other ‘Green”
in Global Warming,” WorldNetDaily.com, February
3, 2007, http://www.wnd.com/index.php/%3C/b%3E//www.shopnetdaily.com/store/index.php/index.php?fa=PAGE.printable&pageId=39997
 Cut-out. In intelligence and espionage, an individual, also
an agent himself, who acts as an intermediary between a case officer
and his agent.
 Mike Adams, “The Downfall of Science and the Rise of
Intellectual Tyranny,” NaturalNews.com, January
21, 2011, http://www.naturalnews.com/031073_science_tyranny.html#ixzz1CTFf5X66.
 This is, i.e., what Michio Kaku hammers almost every day in
the minds of his naïve, gullible listeners of his Science
Fantastic radio program.
 Stephen Jay Gould, “Nonoverlapping Magisteria,”
Natural History, March 1997.
 “To Academicians: Truth Cannot Contradict Truth!,”
Vatican City, October 23, 1996 (VIS), http://biblelight.net/darwin.htm.
Servando Gonzalez is a Cuban-born American writer, semiologist
and intelligence analyst. He has written books, essays and articles
on Latin American history, intelligence, espionage, and semiotics.
Servando is the author of Historia herética de la revolución
fidelista, The Secret Fidel Castro, The Nuclear Deception
and La madre de todas las conspiraciones, all available
He also hosted the documentaries Treason in America: The Council
on Foreign Relations and Partners in Treason: The CFR-CIA-Castro
Connection, produced by Xzault Media Group of San Leandro,
His latest book, Psychological Warfare and the New World Order:
The Secret War Against the American People just appeared
and is available at Amazon.com.
Or download a
.pdf copy of the book you can read on your computer or i-Pad.
Servando's new book, OBAMANIA: The New Puppet
and His Masters, is already available at Amazon.com.