The CFR's Amerika
By Servando Gonzalez
A review of 2016: Obama’s America,
a documentary film by Dinesh D’Souza.
2016: Obama’s America is supposed to be a visual
journey into the heart of the world’s most powerful office
to reveal the struggle of whether one man’s past will redefine
America over the next four years. Unfortunately, however, the
man whose past according to D’Souza will redefine America
over the next four years is not David Rockefeller, but the envious
and opportunistic puppet David Rockefeller and his CFR co-conspirators
placed in the White House.
The film begins with the left foot when D’Souza, a native
of India who emigrated to the U.S. when America was still the
land of freedom and opportunity, affirms that this is the country
where you can discuss anything without fear of reprisals. As a
proof, he mentions a public debate he, while a student at Stanford
University, had many years ago with Jesse Jackson. He fails to
mention, however, that no American University has hosted a debate
about the true causes of the 9/11 events. Obviously, D’Souza
lives in a cocoon and is totally unaware of today’s quasi-totalitarian
2016: Obama’s America tells how in 2008 the American
people, disgusted by the excesses of the George W. Bush regime,
hungered for a leader who would unite and lift them from the coming
economic turmoil and war. So, with the help of the mainstream
media, they invested their hope in what they had been brainwashed
to believe was a new kind of president: Barack Hussein Obama.
But then D’Souza embarks on a wild goose chase, a psycho/sociological
analysis trying to prove that Obama is a man with a past who,
lacking the guidance of a father, fell under the influence of
a lot of bad people, most of them anti-American and, therefore,
Communists. This, according to D’Souza, defines who Obama
is, how he thinks, and where he intends to take America and the
Unknowingly, however, D'Souza followed the wrong trail after sniffing
the “Red Herring” of Communism, just a Sen. Joseph
McCarty did. After discovering the widespread treason prevalent
at the higher levels of U.S. Government, McCarthy concluded that,
logically, they had to be Communists. Among them were State Department
officials Alger Hiss (CFR), and Owen Lattimore (CFR), as well
as Harry Hopkins in Franklin Delano Roosevelt's White House and
Harry Dexter White in the Treasury Department. He also accused
General George Marshall (CFR) of treason.
In truth, none of these people were Communists in the sense of
being followers of the classic Marxist-Leninist doctrines, nor
were they true secret agents of the Soviet Union. They were, though,
secret agents of the true and only Communo-Fascist Party of the
U.S.A.: the Council on Foreign Relations.
Actually, any effort to link the conspirators to any known ideology
is a waste of time. The fact that the CFR conspirators have
supported fascist and communist regimes only means that doing
so has helped them advance their secret depopulation and deindustrialization
agendas. They don’t give a rat’s ass if Obama is a
Communist, a fascist, a Mormon or a Muslim, provided he follows
their orders to a “t.”
In the same fashion, the fact that they have supported some political
groups like the gay movement or the New Age religion does not
indicate that they share those beliefs. They have financed, promoted
and supported these groups as fellow travelers, because some elements
in these groups’ agendas, i.e., eugenics, coincide with
theirs. But they would not hesitate to get rid of or even destroy
any of these groups as soon as they become a liability. Proof
of the above is that some of their most useful agents, like Kissinger,
the Clintons, Brzezinski, the Bushes and Carter, just to mention
the most notorious ones, are ideological prostitutes.
In the case of McCarthy, he made the big mistake of believing
that the CFR agents he was fighting were faithful to a particular
ideology: communism. The result was that, despite of the fact
that most of the people he accused eventually were proven traitors,
his gross mistake cost him his career.
Close to the end of the documentary, D’Souza asserts that
his theory that Obama is the product of his inner conflict for
no having a father, is the only one that explains so many apparently
unexplainable things about Obama. But D’Souza is dead wrong.
For example, his theory does not explain why the CIA provided
Obama with a falsified SSN issued from a State in which he never
lived. It also does not explain why, even before he moved to the
White House, the CIA froze all his records and later produced
a falsified birth certificate in an effort to prove that he had
been born in Hawaii.
The main problem with D’Souzas theory to explain Obama’s
behavior is that it confuses effect with cause. Actually, it is
not that Obama acts the way he does because of his troubled family
relations, his friendship with all types of anti-American shady
characters, and his hatred for everything American, but it was
because of these characteristics of his personality that the CFR
talent spotters considered him as a good target for recruitment.
History has shown that they were right. Obama has proved to be
exactly the right type of ambitious, unethical puppet they need
in the White House to carry out the final phase of their plan
for the total destruction of America and the creation of a New
In an October 2010 New York Times Magazine article, Peter
Baker mentioned that “The president who muscled through
Congress perhaps the most ambitious domestic agenda in a generation
finds himself vilified by the right, castigated by the left and
abandoned by the middle.” Now, you have to be very naïve
to believe that a person with such mediocre intellect as Barack
Hussein Obama can have conceived such a revolutionary domestic
agenda. Actually, Obama's agenda is so similar to the CFR's secret
agenda that one can safely surmise it was created at one of the
CFR’s think tanks.
Evidence indicates that every single measure Obama allegedly has
taken on his own actually has been planned at the Harold Pratt
House in Manhattan, headquarters of the Council on Foreign Relations.
But, contrary to Kennedy and Reagan, who dared to ignore some
of the conspirators’ orders and paid dearly for it, Obama
has followed his masters’ orders with gusto, and
perhaps has added some features of his own, as an added insult
to the fools who believe they elected him to office.
After the film ended, some of the audience, most of them obviously
Republicans, commented that the guy [Obama] was a commie. But
that theory has more holes than the classic Swiss cheese.
In the first place, if Obama is a Communist you have to imply
that also George W. Bush was a commie, because Obama has seamlessly
followed Bush’s policies. Bush was the one who opened the
borders to an invasion of illegal aliens. Bush was the one
who, under the pretext of protecting us from terrorism, trashed
the Constitution with the Patriot Act, one of the most anti-American
laws ever signed by a U.S. president
Secondly, if Obama is a Communist, you have to believe that the
Council on Foreign Relations, perhaps the most reactionary organization
in the U.S., is a communist front, because the Obama administration
has as many CFR members in its ranks as the Bush administration
Finally, if Obama is a Communist, you have to be convinced that
the U.S. mainstream media is fully in the hands of communists.
That’s why they have so strongly backed Obama. But this
is utter nonsense. If it is true that most journalists writing
for the mainstream media are liberals, it is no less true that
the mainstream media is owned by very reactionary people, most
of them CFR members.
According to the its promotional advertising, D’Souza’s
film examines the question, “If Obama wins a second term,
where will we be in 2016?” Unfortunately, however, the answer
is not given in the film, at least not directly, so I will give
it to you for free and you can save the price of the film’s
ticket: Disregarding who wins the next election and who is the
next puppet who moves into the White House, the American people
will be worse off than before. The economy will collapse even
more, unemployment will grow, private property rights will continue
to be reduced, the Middle Class will continue shrinking, the U.S.
will be involved in more unnecessary conflicts all around the
globe, the police state will keep growing unchecked and personal
freedom will decrease even more.
In the movie, D’Souza claims that Obama shares the anticolonialist
doctrine of his father, Barack Obama Sr., and is planning to destroy
the United States to advance that doctrine. But it is difficult
to accept that Obama, the puppet of the global neocolonialist
oil magnates, international bankers and CEOs of transnational
corporations ensconced at the Council on Foreign Relations, is
trying to advance any anticolonialist doctrine.
The bottom line is that, even though there is the possibility
that D’Souza’s intentions were pure, his 2016, Obama’s
America is just another disinformation exercise that serves the
interests of the CFR conspirators in their road to implement the
New World Order. One of the main tools the conspirators have used
in their long-term psychological war (PsyWar) against the American
people is implanting in their minds the belief that both parties
are different and that, just by replacing the puppet in the
White House with a new puppet, all things are going to change
for the better.
But history shows that this has never worked. We don’t need
to change the puppets. What we need is to get rid of the puppet
masters, the invisible government of the United States, which
resides at the Harold Pratt House in Manhattan. Unfortunately,
however, the sheeple have been brainwashed so efficiently that
they are ready to make the same mistake they have been making
since the beginning of the past century.
Those who ignore history are condemned to repeat it, over and
over, ad nauseam.
1. Far from being a doctrine to liberate the workers from capitalist
exploitation, Communism is a false ideology conceived by international
bankers and monopoly capitalists to better exploit the workers
2. Recently, Glenn Beck made the mistake of believing that these
people are evil because they are “progressives.” He
is wrong. This blurry ideology they call progressivism is just
a cover to fool some gullible Americans, particularly most of
the ones who proudly call themselves “progressives.”
Proof of it is that, through their actions, “progressives”
have proved to be very regressive. For example, Berkeley’s
“progressives” have always supported the worst and
longest tyranny in Latin America.
3. The now-famous Venona documents —top-secret cables sent
between Moscow and the Soviet embassy in Washington, D.C. intercepted
by the U.S. intelligence services— proved beyond any doubt
that most of the people McCarthy accused of treason were collaborating
with the Soviets. Venona was the name of a secret operation that
in 1946 broke the Soviet codes and snooped on their traffic. What
the Venona intercepts didn’t show, however, is that these
traitors were passing information to the Soviets on behalf of
their true masters, the CFR conspirators.
4. For a convincing, well documented argument that Obama, his
mother, father, grandmother and stepfather had connections to
the CIA, see Wayne Madsen, “The Story of Obama: All in the
Company.” (in three parts, The Wayne Madsen Report,
August 18, 2010. See also, Servando Gonzalez, "Obama: The
Man Who Never Was," servandogonzalez.org, http://www.intelinet.org/sg_site/articles/sg_man_never_was.html.
5. Talent spotter: An intelligence officer or operative whose
function is detecting and evaluating individuals who might be
of value for an intelligence service as potential recruits for
6. Agent recruitment is basically based on the MICE principle
—an acronym for money, ideology, compromise and ego. These
are the basic human weaknesses exploited to convince or force
an unwilling target for recruitment into treachery and espionage.
Some tradecraft experts, however, argue that there is only a motivation
that really matters, and that is ego. That is what ultimately
leads someone to become a spy, to betray his country.
The target for recruitment may see himself as serving a higher
cause, or may think he wants all the money he has been promised.
But these are merely conscious expressions of something deeper,
and that is ego. By the way, D’Souzas’ naive theory
is not new. It was explained in detail last year by Aaron Klein’s
& Brenda J. Elliott’s in their book Red Army: The
Radical Network That Must Be Defeated to Save America. See,
Servando Gonzalez, “Obama’s Red, Communist Army Is
Not Too Different From Bush’s Black, Fascist Army,”
7. Peter Baker, “What Does He Do Now?,” The New
York Times Magazine, October 17, 2010, pp. 41-42.
8. A rule of intelligence and espionage is that disinformation
cannot be generated in a vacuum, but must be based on the target’s
expectations. Usually, intelligence services use disinformation
to fully convince the target of something about which he is already
half-convinced. In the case of the anti-Communist Republicans,
the target is ripe for disinformation.
9. In April, 2006, while CFR agent George W. Bush was meeting
with Mexican President Vicente Fox to discuss behind the backs
of the American people the CFR’s plan for an even easier
and more expedited movement of people between Mexico and the U.S.
by 2010, massive “spontaneous” rallies of half a million
in support of illegal aliens erupted in both Chicago and L.A.
Later it was found that the rallies were well-organized, well-funded
and directed by the hidden hands of globalist foundations with
a one-world agenda. In fact, three of the four major Hispanic
activist groups behind the rallies had received massive funding
from the Ford Foundation as well as more limited support from
the Carnegie and Rockefeller foundations. See, Joseph Farah, “Who's
pulling strings of illegal alien activists? CFR globalists, Ford
Foundation, Soros among puppeteers,” Joseph Farah’s
G2 Bulletin, WorldNetDaily.com, April 4, 2006, http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=49571
10. See, Servando Gonzalez, “Why I Hate Republicans (Including
Tea Partiers), Even More Than I Hate Democrats,” TheIntelHub.com,
May 11, 2012, http://theintelhub.com/2012/05/11/why-i-hate-republicans-including-tea-partiers-even-more-than-i-hate-democrats/.
Servando Gonzalez is a Cuban-born American writer, semiologist
and intelligence analyst. He has written books, essays and articles
on Latin American history, intelligence, espionage, and semiotics.
Servando is the author of Historia herética de la revolución
fidelista, The Secret Fidel Castro, The Nuclear Deception
and La madre de todas las conspiraciones, all available
He also hosted the documentaries Treason in America: The Council
on Foreign Relations and Partners in Treason: The CFR-CIA-Castro
Connection, produced by Xzault Media Group of San Leandro,
California, both available at the author's site at http://www.servandogonzalez.org.
His book, Psychological Warfare and the New World Order: The
Secret War Against the American People appeared in late 2010
and is available at Amazon.com.
Or download a
.pdf copy of the book you can read on your computer or i-Pad.
His book, OBAMANIA: The New Puppet and His Masters,
is available at Amazon.com.
Servando's new book (in Spanish) La CIA,
Fidel Castro, el Bogotazo y el Nuevo Orden Mundial, just
appeared, and is available at Amazon.com
and other bookstores online. He is already working on his next
book, The Council on Foreign Relations and the Betrayal of
the American People: A Chronology of Treason, which he plans
to have ready by the end of this year.