| Why
We Need a Second Party
By Servando Gonzalez
Copyright © 2011. All
rights reserved.
The argument that the two parties should
represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps of the
Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea. Instead,
the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American
people can ‘throw the rascals out’ at any election
without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy.
—Carroll Quigley[1]
The
above assertion is not the product of my imagination. It was written
by Georgetown University professor and Bill Clinton’s mentor
Carroll Quigley, probably the scholar who most closely studied
the conspirators at the Council on Foreign Relations.
When the electorate grows weary of one of the Establishment parties,
added Quigley, “it should be able to replace it, every four
years if necessary, by the other party, which ... will still pursue,
with new vigor, approximately the same basic policies.”
[2] Quigley’s words are the best explanation for the existence
of the Repucratic Party -- which is nothing but another CFR cover
front.
Alabama Governor George Wallace fully agreed with Quigley when
he said: “There’s not a dime’s worth of difference
between the Democrat and Republican Parties.” Currently,
however, there is not even a penny’s worth of difference.
Actually, just a perfunctory analysis of the alleged differences
between Democrats and Republicans show that they are too similar
for comfort. For example, Democrats love killing children in their
mother’s wombs, while Republicans prefer to wait a little
and send them to be killed (and kill others) far away at unwinnable,
unnecessary wars on behalf of the CFR globalist conspirators.
The result is that, on their own ways, both Republicans and Democrats
support the eugenicist agenda of world depopulation.
“Progressive” Democrats see the Republican Christian
religious Right as reactionary. They fail to see, however, that
the New Age religious Left they love so much is even more regressive
— which explains why the Rockefellers and other members
of the most reactionary Right bankroll them.
Both Democrats and Republicans fully agree with and support the
surveillance state, the trashing of the Constitution, the war
on terror, the erosion of civil liberties and the implementation
and extension of the Patriot Act.
Even more important, both Republicans and Democrats, including
the debating Republican candidates, have accepted at face value
such government cock-and-bull stories like the Oklahoma City bombing,
the 9/11 events and the killing of Osama bin Laden, just to mention
a few of the most egregious lies the government has told us. They
seem to ignore that more than 50 percent of Americans do not believe
the U.S. government’s version of these events.
If you still are not convinced that the two-party system is a
myth, just a glimpse at the recent Republican candidates’
two-hour “debate” will prove that both Quigley and
Wallace were right. Without exceptions, the Republican candidates
were as unconvincing and unspired as Gore and Kerry running against
Bush and McCain running against Obama. At the bottom of their
hearts they know that they have no chance of getting nominated
unless they are anointed by the rich and powerful, and that their
campaigns are just a mise-en-scene to fool the gullible
masses.
Some may argue that at least the intentions of some of the Republican
candidates are good. But, because we cannot get into the people’s
minds to know their true intentions, the fact that they have willingly
participated in this travesty only contributes to give credibility
to an essentially dishonest process. Consequently, they have acted
against the best interests of the American people.
These politicians know much better than you and me that America
is not a Republic anymore. It has been changed behind our backs
into a representative democracy. The only problem is that the
politicians in Washington don’t represent us, but the corporations
that have bought them like pigs in a fair through their “campaign
contributions” — an American euphemism for what people
in the rest of the world simply call bribes.
The idea that both parties are a fiction created and bankrolled
by Wall Street bankers is not new. Proof of it is that the cartoon
on the left appeared in an early 20th-century issue of Harper’s
magazine.
Initially, the two party system was not a bad idea. In a democratic
society, most important decisions are the result of a compromise
of opposing factions, one slightly to the left, and the other
slightly to the right, competing for setting what they consider
the best course for their country to follow. Early in the game,
however, the conspirators who hate America and wanted to change
it into a communo-fascist totalitarian society had a better idea.
But, contrary to openly fascists and communists, who want society
changed by fast, violent means, the conspirators choose slow,
gradual infiltration techniques like the ones advocated by British
Fabians and Gramcian communists. Consequently, they decided to
infiltrate both main political parties to turn them into useful,
secret tools to advance their secret globalist agenda.
Once this initial infiltration step was achieved, and with almost
total control of the mainstream media and the educational system,
they began using sophisticated techniques of psychological manipulation
to keep the American public under the impression that they were
the ones electing their presidents. The fact that in the last
fifty years American presidents belonging to both parties have
systematically trashed the Constitution and betrayed the people
who voted for them[3] is proof enough that our votes are irrelevant.
The real inconvenient truth is that American voters don’t
elect American presidents any longer. Actually, perhaps with the
exception of John F. Kennedy, would be American presidents are
tapped at the secret meetings of the Council of Foreign relations,
the Bohemian Grove, the Bilderberg Group, or the World Economic
Forum. Once they are selected, the rest is just smoke and mirrors
and psychological manipulation to make gullible American voters
believe that they had been the ones who have elected their presidents.
In the last three presidential elections Americans were brainwashed
into giving their votes to the lesser of two evils. The belief
on anyone but Bush I, gave us Clinton. Then, anyone but Clinton
brought us Bush II. Anyone but Bush II gave us Obama. Mentions
of anyone but Obama are already appearing on the web. But, as
Albert Einstein once said, insanity is doing the same thing over
and over and expecting different results.
A few months ago I asked the president of the Tea Party movement
of a southern city why the Tea Party should not become a true,
independent party. Her answer was, because never in the U.S. a
third party has won an election. But, according to that logic,
a foreign-born Muslim would have never been elected president
of the United States. Nevertheless, the usurper is currently flying
on Air Force One to play in a golf course somewhere in the U.S.
Canadian media critic Marshall McLuhan once said that people advance
with their eyes fixed on the rear view mirror, and this seems
to be the case of most Tea Party members. If we want to save this
country from an imminent catastrophe we need to think outside
the box and look to the future instead. For this, we must begin
by stopping playing the disinformers’ game and see the Republican-Democratic
hoax as what it really is: the true communo-fascist party of America.
Consequently, we need a true, independent second party.
The Tea party movement will not do, because it has become evident
that the conspirators recruited Sarah Palin and used her as a
Judas goat to guide the Tea Party sheeple right into the Republican
slaughterhouse. The Libertarian party would not do either, because
a true libertarian would never become a politician — as
Groucho Marx once said, “I don’t want to belong to
any club that accepts me as a member.”
So, are there any options left? Well, there are.
Faithful to my personal policy of never giving my vote to any
Republican or Democrat, nor to any incumbent, in the past presidential
election I gave my vote to Chuck Baldwin, the Constitutional Party
candidate. I think that, despite the disinformers’ opinion
about third parties, the combination of Chuck Baldwin and Jesse
Ventura, running as independents or as candidates of a true second
party, would be a winner.
Why do I believe so?
In the first place, because none of them are
members of the corrupt Republican or Democratic parties, nor are
they incumbent, for-life career politicians. Secondly, because
I think that currently they are the only ones who not only love
the America the conspirators hate, but also have the knowledge,
the integrity, the honesty, the willingness, and the guts to stop
in their tracks both the Washington traitors and the globalist
conspirators who support them.
---------------
Notes:
[1] Carroll Quigley, Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World
in Our Time (New York: Macmillan, 1966), pp. 1247-1248.
[2] Quigley, Ibid.
[3] See Servando Gonzalez, “Call Him Bushama,” The
Intel Hub, May 14, 2011, http://theintelhub.com/2011/05/14/call-him-bushama/
---------------
Servando Gonzalez is a Cuban-born American writer, semiologist
and intelligence analyst. He has written books, essays and articles
on Latin American history, intelligence, espionage, and semiotics.
Servando is the author of Historia herética de la revolución
fidelista, The Secret Fidel Castro, The Nuclear Deception
and La madre de todas las conspiraciones, all available
at Amazon.com.
He also hosted the documentaries Treason in America: The Council
on Foreign Relations and Partners in Treason: The CFR-CIA-Castro
Connection, produced by Xzault Media Group of San Leandro,
California.
His latest book, Psychological Warfare and the New World Order:
The Secret War Against the American People just appeared
and is available at Amazon.com.
Or download a
.pdf copy of the book you can read on your computer or i-Pad.
Servando's new book, OBAMANIA: The New Puppet
and His Masters, is already available at Amazon.com. |